Dell to release new 20.1" widescreen LCD for $289

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

acegazda

Platinum Member
May 14, 2006
2,689
1
0
Originally posted by: xtknight
There's no chance at all that this LCD contains an S-IPS or S-PVA like in the 2007WFP. It'll be a 6-bit/fast TN panel with limited viewing angles and lower contrast. That said, it has the potential to be a great gaming LCD (if you're on a cheap budget of course).

like I said ;) I've learned a thing or two from reading your threads xt.
 

archcommus

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
8,115
0
76
Originally posted by: xtknight
There's no chance at all that this LCD contains an S-IPS or S-PVA like in the 2007WFP. It'll be a 6-bit/fast TN panel with limited viewing angles and lower contrast. That said, it has the potential to be a great gaming LCD (if you're on a cheap budget of course).
How do you know for sure it will use a different panel than the 2007WFP? It's possible it is the exact same in every way except the lack of USB, composite, and S-video.

 

keeleysam

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2005
8,131
0
0
Originally posted by: archcommus
Originally posted by: xtknight
There's no chance at all that this LCD contains an S-IPS or S-PVA like in the 2007WFP. It'll be a 6-bit/fast TN panel with limited viewing angles and lower contrast. That said, it has the potential to be a great gaming LCD (if you're on a cheap budget of course).
How do you know for sure it will use a different panel than the 2007WFP? It's possible it is the exact same in every way except the lack of USB, composite, and S-video.
The reason for this is cost. S-IPS and S-PVA panels are significantly more expensive than the TN panels.

A 5ms 8-bit panel would send Dell into the red at this price.
 

GimpyFuzznut

Senior member
Sep 2, 2002
347
0
0
Does anyone know if this monitor can display black bars (based on other Dell monitors)? I hate %^# LCD monitors that just stretch non-native resolutions and completely distort the image. Obviously for gaming purposes, that completely sucks balls. From what I understand, Dell monitors allow you to stretch the image or display them 1:1? Any ideas?

I would be all over that Samsung monitor for the same price but from I understand, it only displays native resolution properly. Black bars are a good thing dammit!
 

archcommus

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
8,115
0
76
I can't decide if a faster 6-bit or a slower 8-bit panel is preferable for a new widescreen for gaming!!
 

keeleysam

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2005
8,131
0
0
Originally posted by: GimpyFuzznut
Does anyone know if this monitor can display black bars (based on other Dell monitors)? I hate %^# LCD monitors that just stretch non-native resolutions and completely distort the image. Obviously for gaming purposes, that completely sucks balls. From what I understand, Dell monitors allow you to stretch the image or display them 1:1? Any ideas?

I would be all over that Samsung monitor for the same price but from I understand, it only displays native resolution properly. Black bars are a good thing dammit!

I've owned many different models of Dell LCDs, and they all have three modes:

1. 1:1 (What you want)
2. Fill (What you hate)
3. Aspect (Displays with full height or width with bars)
 

acegazda

Platinum Member
May 14, 2006
2,689
1
0
Originally posted by: archcommus
I can't decide if a faster 6-bit or a slower 8-bit panel is preferable for a new widescreen for gaming!!

well, 8 bit panels with like 16ms response are known to perform the same in gaming as 6 bit panels with 8ms response, so I guess it depends on what you're using the monitor for as a whole. If you use it soley for gaming, then get the 6 bit tn panel. These are also less expensive. If you do photo/video editing and watch lots of movies with some games too, then a more expensive 8 bit panel might be worth it.
 

archcommus

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
8,115
0
76
Originally posted by: acegazda
Originally posted by: archcommus
I can't decide if a faster 6-bit or a slower 8-bit panel is preferable for a new widescreen for gaming!!

well, 8 bit panels with like 16ms response are known to perform the same in gaming as 6 bit panels with 8ms response, so I guess it depends on what you're using the monitor for as a whole. If you use it soley for gaming, then get the 6 bit tn panel. These are also less expensive. If you do photo/video editing and watch lots of movies with some games too, then a more expensive 8 bit panel might be worth it.
Hmm, hard to decide. On one hand, I'd say 16 ms would be okay for me if you say they perform similarly, and I'm not a ghosting nut, and 8-bit might be nice, but OTOH, I don't do photo or video editing at all, so why sacrifice speed for better color reproduction that I may not even notice or need.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,321
5,432
136
Yes this is ultra cost reduced:

TN panel - The least expensive type.
Much fewer input connections. No S-Video, no composite.
No PIP. Might not have scaling option (aspect, 1:1) (other cheap Dell TNs don't)
Simple non adjustable stand (no pivot to portrait, no height adjustment).

Does it come with a DVI cable? :)

Anyway this is going to be the cheapest 20" on the market, Dell is going sell trainloads of them.
 

videopho

Diamond Member
Apr 8, 2005
4,185
29
91
Originally posted by: guidryp

Does it come with a DVI cable? :)

Anyway this is going to be the cheapest 20" on the market, Dell is going sell trainloads of them.
[/quote]


1) All Dell monitors with dvi input comes with one, this one should be no difference

2) Won't last for long. The other retailers are watching and expect the price war amongst the 20" w/s from now and should last well into Xmas time frame which is great for consumers.

Spec
 

w00t

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 2004
5,545
0
0
nice monitor speacially for the price, I already have a 2005FPW though and I don't use the USB HUB/Composite/S-video
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
I am kinda annoyed at the influx of cheapo 20" WS LCDs...

Not because low prices are bad obviously, but because they're all crappy TNs :frown:
I had hoped to see the larger displays come down in price, but i'm thinking of the good ones (S-IPS/S-PVA, etc.)

Of course, that hasn't happened :(
 

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
Originally posted by: archcommus
Originally posted by: acegazda
Originally posted by: archcommus
I want to know if this panel is 8-bit or not.

It's a tn panel so... no.
Are you sure? Wouldn't it use the same panel as the 2007WFP? And that model claims to have 16.7 million colors. I was under the impression 16.7 million equates to 8-bit and 16.2 million equates to 6-bit.

Does it even matter much? I'm happy with the colors on my 6-bit display.

Why would it use the same panel as a 2007wfp for a cheaper price? Obviously this cheap price point points to a TN panel.

Also 16.7million colors does not mean true 8-bit.

If your just an avg joe, then i'm thinking 8 bit wont matter much.