Virgorising
Diamond Member
Hi.
While I always choose the chip first when I shop for new/used Optiplexes on ebay, I also liked that the one I am on right now shipped with the EPA PSU (more money).
I have seen much dissing over time re Dell PSUs. It was why, in my now backup Opti, I upgraded that one. I came to realize, over time, that was not necessary, esp with integrated graphics; a fine company makes Dell's PSUs, often Fortron, tho I have only had experience with the Optiplex business line....and, Dell PSUs are, like Antec, rated at continuous wattage, not maximum as are so many aftermarket units.
How come there isn't a consistent standard for rating PSUs??? Shouldn't there be one?
I see there is a sticky thread for how PSUs are rated, but shouldn't the industry adopt a consistent standard?
Thanks!
While I always choose the chip first when I shop for new/used Optiplexes on ebay, I also liked that the one I am on right now shipped with the EPA PSU (more money).
I have seen much dissing over time re Dell PSUs. It was why, in my now backup Opti, I upgraded that one. I came to realize, over time, that was not necessary, esp with integrated graphics; a fine company makes Dell's PSUs, often Fortron, tho I have only had experience with the Optiplex business line....and, Dell PSUs are, like Antec, rated at continuous wattage, not maximum as are so many aftermarket units.
How come there isn't a consistent standard for rating PSUs??? Shouldn't there be one?
I see there is a sticky thread for how PSUs are rated, but shouldn't the industry adopt a consistent standard?
Thanks!
Last edited: