Okay, so either he's giving the "average" Ivy too much credit or Haswell not enough credit.
I think the days of IBT as a real-world stability test are at an end though. You can tell some things from it, but it's starting to get a little "furmark-ey" in that the loads are starting to get to the point where there's a disconnect with real-world loads.
I suppose there is, was, and always will be a difference of opinion on what kind of loading is considered appropriate testing for a "24/7 OC". I suppose also different definitions of stable (24/7/365 stable vs just stable enough to finish 5 non-AVX IBTs after 10 boots so you can take a screenshot and post it.) I guess the takeaway is with various versions of IBT resulting in ~60 - 180 Gflops from the same chip at the same speed, you have to be really careful what conclusions you draw from IBT data.
I always consider stable to be stable enough I'd be comfortable giving my overclocked system to my mother or grandmother. I think a lot of people posting OC results don't agree with that definition of stability, as I always find stable to be WAY higher voltage and/or lower clocks than people post screenshots of. My de-lidded Ivy was stable only "grandma stable" at ~4.0-4.1 at 1.165... not a chance at 4.5. The question for me is sifting through all these results to try and figure where Haswell is "grandma stable". My impression is that it's probably a much quicker transition from "grandma stable" to "doesn't even boot" than Ivy and SB had, but I'm not convinced there's a ton of difference in "grandma stable" clocks from where Ivy was (yet.)