• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

defragment hard drive...

sgleo87

Member
Here is the deal: I have defragmented my C: drive but the disk defragmenter and also a program called lacelevel that analyses how defragmented your hard drive is tell me that I should defragment my hard drive. But there are no fragmented files left...
-disk defragmenter analysis
-lace level analysis
How can this be and how can I get rid of this fragmentation?
 
Well I dunno, but that "fragment" could be an active program running while you are doing scan (like new webpages loading when u defrag/listening to music/looking @ pics. Or "virtual" memory I wouldn't worry about it.
 
Defragging and Optimizing are two different things. The latter includes the former, but the former alone does not optimize (move all the files to an optimal position based on your usage while defragging.) Many folks do not differentiate. That may be what your Lacelevel is referring to.
 
The built-in defragmenter in Windows does not compact files to remove free space between files. So even if you've got files sitting at the very end of the drive with 10 gigs of free space between them and the rest of the files, it will leave them there unless they actually get fragmented.

The built-in defragmenter DOES perform optimizations based on usage. That's one of the major features Microsoft touts for increasing performance with XP. The system tracks the way program files load, in order to move the most needed parts towards the beginning of the drive. But it only does that with executables and DLL files as far as I know. Everything else is just defragmented and left where it is, again without regard to reducing the free space between files. (XP by default automatically performs this optimization during idle periods every 3 days, whether you actually run the defragmenter or not. It does not defragment every other file at that time though.)

For the most part, the built-in defragmenter is eliminated fragmentation-related performance loss. For most people there's no need to go any further. If you want to squeeze the last bit of performance out (which translates into almost unnoticeable differences usually) then you can get a 3rd party program like Diskeeper, Norton Utilities or PerfectDisk to perform a more thorough defragment. Those other programs do in some cases also perform more optimizations of the files based on usage.
 
thx everyone! I have used Dirms and Buzzsaw in the past but like you all said there is a difference between defragmenting and optimizing. I used Perfectdisk and O&O defrag and now my harddrives are also optimized and my lace level is a lot lower now. Thx everyone 😉
 
Back
Top