• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Death threats via cell phone

gwrober

Golden Member
As creepy as it is, I'm amazed at the ability to do such things...



Link


Tacoma, WA - Wednesday, June 27, 2007

A horror movie come to life

Three Fircrest families receive death threats via cell phone. Even when the phones are off. Even when they get new phones.

SEAN ROBINSON; The News Tribune
Last updated: June 20th, 2007 07:37 AM (PDT)

Maybe it?s just a long-running prank, but the reign of terror endured by three Fircrest families buries the needle on the creepy meter.
For four months, the Kuykendalls, the Prices and the McKays say, they?ve been harassed and threatened by mysterious cell phone stalkers who track their every move and occasionally lurk by their homes late at night, screaming and banging on walls.

Police can?t seem to stop them. The late-night visitors vanish before officers arrive. The families say investigators have a hard time believing the stalkers can control cell phones without touching them and suspect an elaborate hoax. Complaints to their phone companies do no good ? the families say they?ve been told what the stalkers are doing is impossible.

It doesn?t feel impossible to Heather Kuykendall and her sister, Darci Price, who?ve saved and recorded scores of threatening voice mails, uttered in throaty, juvenile rasps stolen from bad horror films.

Price and Kuykendall have given the callers a name: ?Restricted.? That?s the word that shows up on their caller ID windows: on the land lines at home, and on every one of their cell phones.

Their messages, left at all hours, threaten death ? to the families, their children and their pets.

?They tell us that they see us,? Kuykendall said Tuesday. ?They tell us that they know everything we?re doing.?

It?s gotten so bad the sisters? parents have offered a $1,000 reward to anyone who identifies the culprits.

The stalkers know what the family is eating, when adults leave the house, when they go to baseball games. They know the color of shirt Courtney Kuykendall, 16, is wearing. When Heather Kuykendall recently installed a new lock on the door of the house, she got a voice mail. During an interview with The News Tribune on Tuesday, she played the recording.

The stalkers taunted her, telling her they knew the code. In another message, they threatened shootings at the schools Kuykendall?s children attend.

?I?m warning you,? one guttural message says. ?Don?t send them to school. If you do, say goodbye.?

Somehow, the callers have gained control of the family cell phones, Price and Kuykendall say. Messages received by the sisters include snatches of conversation overheard on cell-phone mikes, replayed and transmitted via voice mail. Phone records show many of the messages coming from Courtney?s phone, even when she?s not using it ? even when it?s turned off.

Price and Kuykendall say the stalkers knew when they visited Fircrest police and sent a voice-mail message that included a portion of their conversation with a detective.

The harassment seems to center on Courtney, but it extends to her parents, her aunt Darcy and Courtney?s friends, including Taylor McKay, who lives across the street in Fircrest. Her mother, Andrea McKay, has received messages similar to those left at the Kuykendall household and cell phone bills approaching $1,000 for one month. She described one recent call: She was slicing limes in the kitchen. The stalkers left a message, saying they preferred lemons.

?Taylor and Courtney seem to be the hub of the harassment, and different people have branched off from there,? Andrea McKay said. ?I don?t know how they?re doing it. They were able to get Taylor?s phone number through Courtney?s phone, and every contact was exposed.?

McKay, a teacher in the Peninsula School District, said she and Taylor recently explained the threats to the principal at Gig Harbor High School, which Taylor attends. A Gig Harbor police officer sat in on the conversation, she said.

While the four people talked, Taylor?s and Andrea?s phones, which were switched off, sat on a table. While mother and daughter spoke, Taylor?s phone switched on and sent a text message to her mother?s phone, Andrea said.

The Kuykendalls and Prices report similar experiences. Richard Price, Darcy?s husband, is a 26-year military officer, assigned to McChord Air Force Base. On a recent trip to the base, the stalkers sent him a message.

?McChord needs us,? the voice said.

Mari Manley, 16, one of Courtney?s close friends, is another victim of the harassment. She tried to avoid the calls by ignoring her phone. Late one night, she heard the phone making an unfamiliar noise. Her ringtone had changed.

?Answer your phone,? a guttural voice said. Manley saved the ringtone, and played it during an interview Tuesday.

The families and their friends have adopted a new routine: They block the cameras on their phones with tape. They take out the batteries to stop the calls. The Prices and Kuykendalls returned all their corrupted phones to their wireless company and replaced them with new ones. The threatening messages kept coming.

Fircrest Police Chief John Cheesman is familiar with the case and knows the families. His department is working the case with the Tacoma Police Department and the Pierce County Sheriff?s Office, he said. The agencies filed a search warrant for the phone records, but they didn?t reveal much. Many of the calls and text messages trace back to Courtney?s phone, which the family believes has been electronically hijacked.

Cell phone technology allows remote monitoring of calls, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Known as a ?roving bug,? it works whether a phone is on or off. FBI agents tracking organized crime have used it to monitor meetings among mobsters. Global positioning systems, installed in many cell phones, also make it possible to pinpoint a phone?s location within a few feet.

According to James M. Atkinson, a Massachusetts-based expert in counterintelligence who has advised the U.S. Congress on security issues, it?s not that hard to take remote control of a wireless phone. ?You do not have to have a strong technical background for someone to do this,? he said Tuesday. ?They probably have a technically gifted kid who probably is in their neighborhood.?

Courtney Kuykendall says she has no idea who the stalkers are, though she knows police are suspicious. She believes someone followed her at school ? a man in a hooded sweatshirt with a beard.

?They?re accusing my daughter of threatening her own family,? Heather Kuykendall said.

?Why would I do that?? Courtney said. ?Why would I do that to people I care about? Why would I harass my own family??

Originally published: June 20th, 2007 01:20 AM (PDT)

 
I did it.

This is why big business directors leave the batteries out of their phones at important meetings, not just turned off. In 2003 an Al-Qaeda leader was targeted and killed by a hellfire missile fired from a predator UAV, after his phone was remotely turned on and triangulated.
 
Originally posted by: Roguestar
I did it.

This is why big business directors leave the batteries out of their phones at important meetings, not just turned off. In 2003 an Al-Qaeda leader was targeted and killed by a hellfire missile fired from a predator UAV, after his phone was remotely turned on and triangulated.


I love this country. :beer:

I've heard of triangulation via cells, etc, but this is the first that *I've* heard about cell manipulation like this....intriguing...
 
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: paulxcook
It's pathetic the police have let this continue. Sounds like a bad movie plot.</end quote></div>

and what exactly do you want them to do about it?


that is some creepy sh!t though. i had no idea that kind of stuff could be done.
 
My first thought was that it was the daughter. My second thought was shens. My third thought, after reading the posts here, was, "You can turn on phones remotely?"

I lose.
 
Originally posted by: pontifex

and what exactly do you want them to do about it?


that is some creepy sh!t though. i had no idea that kind of stuff could be done.

I don't know, maybe... outsmart the kid doing this? The story mentioned that the voice was guttural but juvenile: I took that to mean it was some kid or kids. If the people are outside the family's house watching the mom cut limes, the police should be able to apprehend them.

You would think the police would be hard at work on this case, as copycats will eventually figure out the same technology. It seems like the police are completely blindsided by this ability to take over cell phones. If the police don't have the resources to find the perp, perhaps they need to ask the feds for help. As the article said, it's apparently not that hard to take control of a wireless phone. Yet two police depts. and a sheriff's dept. can't figure this out?
 
Originally posted by: paulxcook

You would think the police would be hard at work on this case, as copycats will eventually figure out the same technology. It seems like the police are completely blindsided by this ability to take over cell phones. If the police don't have the resources to find the perp, perhaps they need to ask the feds for help. As the article said, it's apparently not that hard to take control of a wireless phone. Yet two police depts. and a sheriff's dept. can't figure this out?

That's what scares me....I wonder how much help the cell companies are giving. And whomever is up to this has obviously nothing better to do, it must take a lot of time to cyber, cell, and physically stalk someone and their friends...
 
so where can i get a hold of this software or device or whatever it is that lets you do this stuff? i'm a good boy, i swear!:evil:
 
You cannot turn a phone on remotely. You cannot use a phone as a microphone when it's off. Intercepting cell phone signals is either insanely complicated (in the case of GSM) or essentially impossible (CDMA). It's not possible to remotely access a phone and change the ringtone.

ZV
 
Another article:

http://redtape.msnbc.com/2007/06/just-how-easy-i.html

For the truly paranoid, you could consider removing your cell phone battery from your phone when you are not using it. That would foil any attempts to use it as a spying device. Of course, it would also severely limit the phone's usefulness. And you should balance a choice like that with the answers to some realistic questions, such as: How valuable would it be for someone else to remotely access your cell phone camera and take pictures of the inside of your pocket?
 
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
How sure are you of this zenmervolt?

Bluetooth by itself has no way of actually changing any settings on the phone. It's a simple file transfer/networking protocol with a VERY short range (30-100ft, depending on your transmitter).

For one, the only way this could be done is if somebody managed to load an entirely custom-written piece of software that is able to actually emulate key strokes to manipulate the menus on the phone. This is extremely difficult for GSM and (you'd have to know how the hardware of the phone works in order to impersonate the keypad) impossible for CDMA (BREW has handset/ESN and OTA verification; NOBODY has broken the encryption yet, and the phone actually will delete unsigned code on boot) I'm calling shens on this one. Shens/Hoax/Fear-mongering.

Sending a simple "wake-up" signal to the phone is possible, though, as is triangulating the position using "pings" off the towers. That's how they found that CNet(?) editor's family after they got lost in the snow storm. With the newer GPS phones, law enforcement could probably track the phone at the carrier's server level, but that probably would require a subpoena.

And yes, I know about Bluejacking and bluesnarfing, but both these require two things: the person be in range and the victim's phone have bluetooth turned on. Turn off the bluetooth and look for somebody sitting outside your house for hours fiddling with a phone.
 
occasionally lurk by their homes late at night, screaming and banging on walls.

With a 12ga shotgun, some beanbag rounds, and a few sleepless nights I would have cleared this up in a jiffy.
 
Originally posted by: K1052
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>occasionally lurk by their homes late at night, screaming and banging on walls.
</end quote></div>

With a 12ga shotgun, some beanbag rounds, and a few sleepless nights I would have cleared this up in a jiffy.



Why hasn't this been done already I wonder?
 
Originally posted by: gwrober
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: K1052
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>occasionally lurk by their homes late at night, screaming and banging on walls.
</end quote></div>

With a 12ga shotgun, some beanbag rounds, and a few sleepless nights I would have cleared this up in a jiffy.</end quote></div>



Why hasn't this been done already I wonder?

People these days are wusses. I wouldn't even bother with the beanbag rounds. But then again, I live in Texas. 😉
 
Originally posted by: Raduque
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: gwrober


Why hasn't this been done already I wonder?</end quote></div>

People these days are wusses. I wouldn't even bother with the beanbag rounds. But then again, I live in Texas. 😉

So do I, in San Antonio - that's why I was wondering why someone didn't just pull up a lawn chair and sit and wait for the losers to come back...seems like the thing to do, to me!
 
Originally posted by: gwrober
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: K1052
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>occasionally lurk by their homes late at night, screaming and banging on walls.
</end quote></div>

With a 12ga shotgun, some beanbag rounds, and a few sleepless nights I would have cleared this up in a jiffy.</end quote></div>



Why hasn't this been done already I wonder?

Exactly. WTF are the police doing? Waiting to get a call from the people whose phones have been taken over that people are banging on their walls?
 
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
You cannot turn a phone on remotely. You cannot use a phone as a microphone when it's off. Intercepting cell phone signals is either insanely complicated (in the case of GSM) or essentially impossible (CDMA). It's not possible to remotely access a phone and change the ringtone.

ZV</end quote></div>


LOL. I do military communications research/systems design, and lets just say you are wrong on just about every one of those points. (although it sure as hell would be difficult for some random teenage punk to do any of them...)
 
Back
Top