Andrew:
But does it make a complete documentation of his actions and who he hung out with? Does it make notation that matches the bibles descriptions? Im sure its not that in detail. OBTW His name isnt really JESUS. In fact the translation isnt even Jesus. This "Jesus" person is still a LEGEND, who is crusty and old, who's actions cant be proved as FACTUAL. If there was complete, trustworthy documentation on this fellow, I would say he's ok to use as fact. But there is no fact that they are the same Jesus, or that he's the son of god, or the type of people he was with, or the actions he did. THAT is my point, I never said it was 100% proof he didnt exist, now did I?
.....NICE TRY.
BTW I'm not an Atheist, but I'm not a christian either. I am very picky about details so dont bend truths or legends to fit everyones little world, that was my point.