Dear Gtx 680 users. I have a request.

[litwicki22]

Hey guys. I will be very greatful. Can somebody make for me 5 loops from a row in 3dmark 11 in performance mode?
I ask because i have very difference results.
I mean scores on my card,like : 9458 to 9399 then 9438 to 9396 , then 9436 to 9391 and 9391 to 9442. ( score to score, from a row )
If somebody make 5 loops and paste here scores ok?

Please , please. Cheers.

pc:
3770k 3.5 stock
Msi Twin Frozr Gtx 680
8gb ram
301 whql



Please have the same clocks on cpu and gpu on that loops.


I want your the most bigger difference in points between score to next score. So i ask about first 5 scores

 

[hokies83]

That stock scores on a Ref model?

I got 25000k Gpu scores on my Gtx 680s [SLI] with overclocking.

Even on a Ref Gtx 680 a 10k Single card score is pretty easy to break.

 

[litwicki22]

yes all stocks CPU stock , GPU Stock

I want just to see differences between points on final scores From a row. From score to score 1.2.3...

 

[hokies83]

Your about right on those scores for a Gtx 680 non Overclocked model. no need to worry.

 

[litwicki22]

But i have 50+ different points form a row , from score to score. So i ask you guys If i see that you have the almost the same points fluctuation i will be more patient.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...sga6cQ&usg=AFQjCNERaneKlanLEjaYx0SpVKEfG-dpaQ

 

[Ben90]

You realize that the fluctuations from the highest score to lowest you posted is less than 1%?

 

[litwicki22]

yes i realize , but from a row From a row its not too high? ( from score to next score )

 

[Ben90]

 

[aaksheytalwar]

Oc and go past 10k

 

[cmdrdredd]

It's normal, my GTX 670s would exhibit the same type of behavior. There are always variances.

 

[Rvenger]

Yeah, temps make a difference, running processes on your computer etc. Thats totally normal.

I am betting your 680 is hitting the 70c and thermal throttling down at points in the benchmark. Run your GPU fan at 80% and your scores should start to level out better.

 

[zaydq]

Completely normal dude. 3dmark11 tends to have variances of 50~ points. You have absolutely no issues what so ever.

 

[litwicki22]

Yeah, temps make a difference, running processes on your computer etc. Thats totally normal.

I am betting your 680 is hitting the 70c and thermal throttling down at points in the benchmark. Run your GPU fan at 80% and your scores should start to level out better.

You mean 70c is bad? And that 50+- points differences from score to score, from a row are from bad temperature??

 

[Rvenger]

Once your card hits 70c it will start to temp throttle in 13mhz increments.

 

[zaydq]

You mean 70c is bad? And that 50+- points differences from score to score, from a row are from bad temperature??

It can be from a lot of things, 70c is not bad its just when Kepler boost is throttled down slowly to keep the card at a stable temperature and speed. 50+- points are just normal, you probably couldn't do a whole lot to minimize the gap, even if you could, the time it'd take isn't worth it.

 

[blackened23]

OP, you are being really OCD about this. Score variances are normal. You will never replicate a score exactly in back to back benchmark runs, you can get differences of 2-3% and it's completely fine.

 

[litwicki22]

Guys i am very greatful for your help. I am very pleased . But i want to ask about last thing. Here are my latest scores. And that fluctuations between scores are ok or not? PLeaseeee. Look:

 

[cmdrdredd]

A few points here and a few points there. No problem. Now if your first score was say 9400 and the next run was 8700 that indicates something. What you see is standard.

 

[zaydq]

You're still good. Stop crying over a handful of lost points in a useless benchmark . You've got like a .6% variance, which is absolutely fine.

You're also the second 680 user to post a thread like this in the past 30 days... Kinda indicates that 680 users are ocd and are feeling guilty for spending an extra 140$ over a 670. (Just a joke)

 

[chimaxi83]

12069
12080
12065
11970
12039

That 11k score is pretty low, so I might RMA.

 

[litwicki22]

12069
12080
12065
11970
12039

That 11k score is pretty low, so I might RMA.

Thx bro for help. But i want to ask. That scores are from a row? I mean.

12069 is a 1 score...12080 is a 2 score...12065 is a 3 score.....11970 is a 4 score.....12039 is a 5 score? Next question. You used the same settings on GPU and CPU on that tests?

 

[DominionSeraph]

But i want to ask. That scores are from a row?

If he did them concurrently that would be impressive.

 

[chimaxi83]

They were all in a row, identical settings, one after the other, with a reboot between them. Was there a rule against rebooting? :/ lol

 

[litwicki22]

chimaxi83 can you give me links to that scores?

 

[Rvenger]

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1721531
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1038882325#post1038882325
http://forums.overclockersclub.com/index.php?showtopic=193867
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/359601-33-strange-results-3dmark
http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=1547494&mpage=1&print=true


The same thing has been explained to you in every forum. Why don't you take advice and not constantly question everyone otherwise? Your card is fine.