Originally posted by: rjain
Great. We'll make capitalism work by creating state-controlled monopolies. People will trust the corporations because if they don't, they'll have to go to another country to get what they want.
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Specifics. I need specifics.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Specifics. I need specifics.
Dean listed likely targets for what he dubbed as his "re-regulation" campaign: utilities, large media companies and any business that offers stock options. Dean did not rule out "re-regulating" the telecommunications industry, too.
same info - different print press.
I'm sure we'll hear more about the specifics...IF people pick this up, unless it's buried by the press of his brother's situation.
CkG
Originally posted by: rjain
Do you really want one single hardware store, automaker, or media outlet? That's what creating state-controlled monopolies will do.
Wish I could. But when CC owns a large amount of the radio frequency licences for an area, it's difficult to listen to other stations, especially since our current technology limits us to a finite amount of stations.Originally posted by: rjain
So don't listen to Clear Channel. This isn't the Soviet Union, as much as Dean seems to support state-controlled monopolies.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: rjain
Do you really want one single hardware store, automaker, or media outlet? That's what creating state-controlled monopolies will do.
Have you looked outside your Window? That is where we are heading now WITH De-regulation.
Originally posted by: rjain
Do you really want one single hardware store, automaker, or media outlet? That's what creating state-controlled monopolies will do.
Do you even remember the days when you had to get service from one single phone company or not get a phone at all? Do you really think the service and price structures of those days are more desirable than the competitive markets we have now? No more VoIP, no more Sprint, no more MCI. I guess you'll only have one ISP, too. I'm sure you'll love to be locked into one ISP who doesn't care about you because it's illegal for anyone to compete with them.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: rjain
Do you really want one single hardware store, automaker, or media outlet? That's what creating state-controlled monopolies will do.
Do you even remember the days when you had to get service from one single phone company or not get a phone at all? Do you really think the service and price structures of those days are more desirable than the competitive markets we have now? No more VoIP, no more Sprint, no more MCI. I guess you'll only have one ISP, too. I'm sure you'll love to be locked into one ISP who doesn't care about you because it's illegal for anyone to compete with them.
Where is anyone suggesting state controlled monopolies? I think you are projecting a bit here.
Projecting what? That's what regulation is all about. The government controls the pricing, the government controls the volume, the government controls who is allowed to be in the business and who does business with whom. Effectively from the point of view of a specific consumer or producer or even literally, that evolves into a monopoly.Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Where is anyone suggesting state controlled monopolies? I think you are projecting a bit here.Originally posted by: rjain
Do you really want one single hardware store, automaker, or media outlet? That's what creating state-controlled monopolies will do.
Do you even remember the days when you had to get service from one single phone company or not get a phone at all? Do you really think the service and price structures of those days are more desirable than the competitive markets we have now? No more VoIP, no more Sprint, no more MCI. I guess you'll only have one ISP, too. I'm sure you'll love to be locked into one ISP who doesn't care about you because it's illegal for anyone to compete with them.
Originally posted by: rjain
Projecting what? That's what regulation is all about. The government controls the pricing, the government controls the volume, the government controls who is allowed to be in the business and who does business with whom. Effectively from the point of view of a specific consumer or producer or even literally, that evolves into a monopoly.Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Where is anyone suggesting state controlled monopolies? I think you are projecting a bit here.Originally posted by: rjain
Do you really want one single hardware store, automaker, or media outlet? That's what creating state-controlled monopolies will do.
Do you even remember the days when you had to get service from one single phone company or not get a phone at all? Do you really think the service and price structures of those days are more desirable than the competitive markets we have now? No more VoIP, no more Sprint, no more MCI. I guess you'll only have one ISP, too. I'm sure you'll love to be locked into one ISP who doesn't care about you because it's illegal for anyone to compete with them.
Originally posted by: chess9
Virge:
Yes, that is one of the big problems with monopolies, but CCC has done something even more dastardly, particularly from my point of view. One of their stations in Cleveland was encouraging drivers to throw bottles at bike riders, cut them off, give them the finger, etc. Once they realized they had tapped into a gold mine of right wing SUV/speeder/this road is my road sentiment they moved the tactic to more of their stations. One of their major advertisers in Raleigh pulled her advertising, I'm told, because she felt it was so irresponsible. It's one thing to avoid listening and quite another when you fear others WILL be listening.
So, I would recommend a boycott of their stations.
Anyway, yet another reason to feel fear and loathing about the right wing.....
-Robert