Originally posted by: deannicholas
Is it really worth it to go through all the trouble of loading XP on it? Just wondering how bad Vista really is?
As I posted, earlier, few months ago, I got in on a BB closeout of a similar Compaq machine, a
V6719NR for $309 with a 1.9 GHz Athlon 64 X2 and 1 GB of RAM. I also bought 2 x 1GB sticks of RAM from a Fry's special. I booted it to Vista, which took forever, checked it out, booted it a couple more times to get the feel of it and burned the recovery DVD set. I then used Partition Magic to remove the strange, non-standard partition Vista creates and format the disk as a single NTFS partition and installed XP Pro. Now it boots quickly and runs like a bat out of hell.
As a 32 bit OS, XP can't use more than a little over 3GB of RAM, but the video uses shared memory so the with 4GB, the machine will have all the RAM it can use available to Windows, even with the video maxed out.
My machine is spec'd to recognize a max of 2GB of RAM, but others have reported that, like this machine, it will see 4GB (2 x 2GB) so I may bump it up if a really good sale comes along.
The technology keeps advancing to mature production, making it cheaper. That's why they keep building more bloated OS's like Vista to keep the entry level machines slow enough to drive consumers to buy more powerful machines and upgrade them.
That's also why these cheap, powerful units run so much better on XP.
I can't stress heavily enough how important it is to have all required XP drivers and to burn the recovery DVD set before you start. If the installation fails, it's the only way you'll be able to restore the machine to it's original state without serious tech support.
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
I'd rather have the Intel Dual Core model then AMD right now. The Toshiba is still listed but in store only.
I'd rather have a Lenovo for the quality of their build or a Compaq/HP for the quality of their tech support. I've dealt with other companies' tech support when trying to help friends, and many of them are somewhere between pathetic and non-existent.
And, as I posted, my experience has been that the XP drivers for machines with an Athlon 64 and nVidia chipset seem to be easier to find than Intel based products.