motoamd is right, if you're running a 133FSB, there won't be any performance difference but -
a) if you can run the CPU and memory asyncronously - don't know if this can be done anymore with current chipsets, though I believe the vernerable BX could - you may see a performance increase and
b)buying the faster memory may still be a good idea, even if it doesn't provide immediate benefit. Rumor has it that AMD will be going to a 166MHz bus for upcoming Athlons, in which case you'll need DDR 2700. Intel likes to push the FSB on P4s up every once in a while, too. As far as the Hammer goes, I don't think anybody knows, but faster than 133 would still be a good bet, IMO.
This is just my .02; the choice is entirely up to you. You will pay a premium for the faster memory, which is a downside.
Nate