As I've done some searches on the Forum and haven't found any comments on this card and I know that cheap-but-good cards interest people I've made a "mini-review" of my new card, that just arrived:
I have been wanting to upgrade my MSI GF2 Pro card for a whilke, but I couldn't find the right card. Then I saw the Pallit Daytona GF3 Ti200 very cheap (only 2/3 of the price of other GF3 Ti200) so I bought it just to see how suh a cheap card performed, until now I've been a firm believer in "high prices=good cards" so I was a bit worried abbout the card being so cheap. Guess what, I got a pleasant surprise:
3d-Mark 2001 scores:
6636 (defualt speed, 175/400)
7070 (200/450, the first oc I've tried with the card, this was a breeze so I expect to get more out of it).
Those scores is with a XP1600+ @ 1533 (146x10.5), with an out-of spec agp-bus also, but it works fine.
The card is the cheapest GF3-based card I could get, a Palit Daytona GF3Ti200, 33% cheaper than then next-cheapest card here in Denmark.
I was worried about the 2d being bad, as I figured they must be using really bad filters to keep the price so low, but it is actually a little better than my old MSI GF2 Pro, I know that MSI cards have average 2d but I certainly didn't expect to get better 2d from this card.
3d is well, great (it's a GF3 after all), nice, sharp, nothing negative to say about it.
As I haven't tried how much further it'll oc I can't say for sure how great the card really is at that, but nothing beats it at it's price!
I have been wanting to upgrade my MSI GF2 Pro card for a whilke, but I couldn't find the right card. Then I saw the Pallit Daytona GF3 Ti200 very cheap (only 2/3 of the price of other GF3 Ti200) so I bought it just to see how suh a cheap card performed, until now I've been a firm believer in "high prices=good cards" so I was a bit worried abbout the card being so cheap. Guess what, I got a pleasant surprise:
3d-Mark 2001 scores:
6636 (defualt speed, 175/400)
7070 (200/450, the first oc I've tried with the card, this was a breeze so I expect to get more out of it).
Those scores is with a XP1600+ @ 1533 (146x10.5), with an out-of spec agp-bus also, but it works fine.
The card is the cheapest GF3-based card I could get, a Palit Daytona GF3Ti200, 33% cheaper than then next-cheapest card here in Denmark.
I was worried about the 2d being bad, as I figured they must be using really bad filters to keep the price so low, but it is actually a little better than my old MSI GF2 Pro, I know that MSI cards have average 2d but I certainly didn't expect to get better 2d from this card.
3d is well, great (it's a GF3 after all), nice, sharp, nothing negative to say about it.
As I haven't tried how much further it'll oc I can't say for sure how great the card really is at that, but nothing beats it at it's price!