David Hackworth on Wesley Clark

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
Former Clark detractor Col. Hackworth retracts his previous views on Clark

Reporting for duty: Wesley Clark
Posted: September 23, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2003 David H. Hackworth

With Wesley Clark joining the Democratic presidential candidates, there are enough eager bodies pointed toward the White House to make up a rifle squad. This bunch of wannabes could make things increasingly hot for Dubya ? as long as they don't blow each other away with friendly fire.

Since Clark tossed his steel pot into the inferno, I've been constantly asked, "Hack, what do you think of the general?"

For the record, I never served with Clark. But after spending three hours interviewing the man for Maxim's November issue, I'm impressed. He is insightful, he has his act together, he understands what makes national security tick ? and he thinks on his feet somewhere around Mach 3. No big surprise, since he graduated first in his class from West Point, which puts him in the supersmart set with Robert E. Lee, Douglas MacArthur and Maxwell Taylor.

Clark was so brilliant, he was whisked off to Oxford as a Rhodes scholar and didn't get his boots into the Vietnam mud until well after his 1966 West Point class came close to achieving the academy record for the most Purple Hearts in any one war. When he finally got there, he took over a 1st Infantry Division rifle company and was badly wounded.

Lt. Gen. James Hollingsworth, one of our Army's most distinguished war heroes, says: "Clark took a burst of AK fire, but didn't stop fighting. He stayed on the field 'til his mission was accomplished and his boys were safe. He was awarded the Silver Star and Purple Heart. And he earned 'em."

It took months for Clark to get back in shape. He had the perfect excuse, but he didn't quit the Army to scale the corporate peaks as so many of our best and brightest did back then. Instead, he took a demoralized company of short-timers at Fort Knox who were suffering from a Vietnam hangover and made them the best on post ? a major challenge in 1970 when our Army was teetering on the edge of anarchy. Then he stuck around to become one of the young Turks who forged the Green Machine into the magnificent sword Norman Schwarzkopf swung so skillfully during Round One of the Gulf War.

I asked Clark why he didn't turn in his bloody soldier suit for Armani and the big civvy dough that was definitely his for the asking.

His response: "I wanted to serve my country."

He says he now wants to lead America out of the darkness, shorten what promises to be the longest and nastiest war in our history and restore our eroding prestige around the world.

For sure, he'll be strong on defense. But with his high moral standards and because he knows where and how the game's played, there will probably be zero tolerance for either Pentagon porking or two-bit shenanigans.

No doubt he's made his share of enemies. He doesn't suffer fools easily and wouldn't have allowed the dilettantes who convinced Dubya to do Iraq to even cut the White House lawn. So he should prepare for a fair amount of dart-throwing from detractors he's ripped into during the past three decades.

Hey, I am one of those: I took a swing at Clark during the Kosovo campaign when I thought he screwed up the operation, and I called him a "Perfumed Prince." Only years later did I discover from his book and other research that I was wrong ? the blame should have been worn by British timidity and William Cohen, U.S. SecDef at the time.

At the interview, Clark came along without the standard platoon of handlers and treated the little folks who poured the coffee and served the bacon and eggs with exactly the same respect and consideration he gave the biggies in the dining room like my colleague Larry King and Bob Tisch, the Regency Hotel's owner. An appealing common touch.

But if he wins the election, don't expect an Andrew Jackson field-soldier type. Clark's an intellectual, and his military career is more like Ike's ? that of a staff guy and a brilliant high-level commander. Can he make tough decisions? Bet on it. Just like Ike did during his eight hard but prosperous years as president.

Reporting for duty: Wesley Clark

Day by day, I like this man more and more.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
newsworthy, but jahawkin gets 'first to post' credit on this article in this thread, near the bottom. ;)

so far i like him too.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
I have to agree, i'm getting more and more impressed with him as well. Thanks for the article.
 

Bulk Beef

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
5,466
0
76
Re: Clark - Maybe. We'll see.

Re: Hackworth - Why is it that every time I read his stuff, I find myself looking over my shoulder like some kid browsing through a copy of Soldier of Fortune at the 7-11 magazine rack?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Saw him on the Today show this morning. Read Hackworth's article above. Clark is looking more and more promising.
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
To be fair. He really hasn't said all that much about his positions yet.

Agreed. He does seem to be very promising, but I'll hold off my final judgement until I hear some more specifics.
 

Pennstate

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 1999
3,211
0
0
oh, the smear campaigns on Clark :) It's even pissing off conservatives. I guess O'Lielly and Hannity won't be having Hackworth on their show to discuss Clark.


On the topic of issues. GWB ran his entire campaign based on "integrity", which he turned out to have none. Remember the slogan from 2000? "GWB will bring Integrity and Accountability to the WH"?
 

Bulk Beef

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
5,466
0
76
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
To be fair. He really hasn't said all that much about his positions yet.
I've effectively killed two Wesley Clark Circle Jerk threads by pointing that out. :D
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
To be fair. He really hasn't said all that much about his positions yet.

Agreed. He does seem to be very promising, but I'll hold off my final judgement until I hear some more specifics.
The problem is that politicians' self-proclaimed positions are usually etched in sand. If there's a shift in public opinion (or campaign contributions), those positions vanish in the wind.

I'm much more interested in candidate's character and intelligence. That's why I never liked Bush-lite, yet I tend to think McCain and Clark would both be good presidents. Probably Dean too, though that's not as clear yet. It's not about parties, it's about principles.
 

phillyTIM

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2001
1,942
10
81
Actually there will soon be a group called "Clark's Bush-busters"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!