Daughter Beaten By Dad Who's A Texas Judge: It Happened Regularly

[zsdersw]

never once beat a child or woman, and never will.

Yet you make excuses for what this judge did. That's almost as bad.

 

[fskimospy]

yawn. a da who stated he wasn't even sure of the extent of the "crime", possibly bowing to unwarranted public outrage. no federal charges as well.

it's fine you continue to duck the uncle "beating" video, which matches the physical type of whippings of the judge video. as stated previously, your only issue is the judge's tone. point stands. the pussification of america continues.

I don't think you understand what 'the point stands' means. Having a legal authority refute what you said is the exact opposite of having your point stand.

 

[al981]

I don't think you understand what 'the point stands' means. Having a legal authority refute what you said is the exact opposite of having your point stand.

a conviction would be true refutation. do acknowledge that basic fact. unwarranted uproars in public opinion have certainly swayed DAs to be wrong in the past: see nifong in the duke scandal

another post by eskimo, another ducking of the uncle "beating" video. good stuff.

 

[al981]

Yet you make excuses for what this judge did. That's almost as bad.

no excuses. the judge's physical whippings were no different than what the uncle gave his nephew. just pointing out your hypocritcal responses.

also hilarious to note: similar national outrage was directed towards the tiger mother just a few months ago.

the pussification of america continues.

 

[zsdersw]

no excuses. the judge's physical whippings were no different than what the uncle gave his nephew. just pointing out your hypocritcal responses.

also hilarious to note: similar national outrage was directed towards the tiger mother just a few months ago.

the pussification of america continues.

I find nothing any more acceptable about what the uncle did.

404 - Hypocrisy Not Found.

 

[-Slacker-]

Ok already, by this point we all gathered this al981 guy is a douchebag, everybody caught up on it.

So why does everybody keep replying to him? Do you think he'll change his mind, especially now that he's been antagonized by almost every poster in the thread?

Just ignore the cave man, for fuck's sake.

 

[zsdersw]

You're by no means obligated to read the replies.

 

[al981]

I find nothing any more acceptable about what the uncle did.

404 - Hypocrisy Not Found.

then hurry up and report the uncle! surely he'll be charged and convicted for his heinous abusive crime, amirite?

 

[zsdersw]

then hurry up and report the uncle! surely he'll be charged and convicted for his heinous abusive crime, amirite?

I doubt it.

Question for you: Do you think the judge and the uncle behaved properly?

 

[fskimospy]

a conviction would be true refutation. do acknowledge that basic fact. unwarranted uproars in public opinion have certainly swayed DAs to be wrong in the past: see nifong in the duke scandal

another post by eskimo, another ducking of the uncle "beating" video. good stuff.

Of course. I stick with the case at hand. The fact that you are trying to refute a DA with youtube is pretty telling.

If this is an example of America becoming pussies, you are an example of America becoming stupid.

 

[al981]

I doubt it.

Question for you: Do you think the judge and the uncle behaved properly?

heh. you doubt it. point proven.

and to answer your question, absolutely, especially with regards to a belt being used waist level or below. the fact that nobody here can point out the physical difference between the whippings is hilarious. having an angry tone isn't a crime either. the only possible "crime" seen in the video might be the shoving the daughter's face towards the bed.

chris brown style beatdown not found.

 

[al981]

Of course. I stick with the case at hand. The fact that you are trying to refute a DA with youtube is pretty telling.

If this is an example of America becoming pussies, you are an example of America becoming stupid.

the fact you continue to duck the youtube video that you mock is pretty telling.

edit: at least zsd had the guts to address the video, and he believes the uncle can't be charged. your turn, son.

 

[zsdersw]

and to answer your question, absolutely, especially with regards to a belt being used waist level or below. the fact that nobody here can point out the physical difference between the whippings is hilarious. having an angry tone isn't a crime either. the only possible "crime" seen in the video might be the shoving the daughter's face towards the bed.

So the concept of "proportional response" is completely lost on you.

at least zsd had the guts to address the video, and he believes the uncle can't be charged

I don't know if he can be charged. My doubt is simply in whether someone will try.

If it were up to me, both of these guys, the judge and the uncle, wouldn't have functioning balls by the time I'm done with them.

 

[LumbergTech]

no excuses. the judge's physical whippings were no different than what the uncle gave his nephew. just pointing out your hypocritcal responses.

also hilarious to note: similar national outrage was directed towards the tiger mother just a few months ago.

the pussification of america continues.

You do realize the whole point of the tiger mother thing was that she came to realize the flaws of her way of thinking?

 

[fskimospy]

the fact you continue to duck the youtube video that you mock is pretty telling.

edit: at least zsd had the guts to address the video, and he believes the uncle can't be charged. your turn, son.

It's really not. You attempt to refute the statements of a professional prosecutor by linking to Youtube, and a video from an account registered in another state that's governed by different child abuse laws no less to go along with your internet lawyering. Don't mistake my mockery of you for anything else, I'm just pointing out how dumb your argument is and nothing more.

I don't really have anything else to add, because you haven't added anything worthy of discussion. If you want me to keep making fun of you and telling you how stupid you are though, I can keep it up almost indefinitely.

Let me know.

 

[CitizenKain]

the pussification of america continues.

Why do you continue to talk about your family?

 

[al981]

You do realize the whole point of the tiger mother thing was that she came to realize the flaws of her way of thinking?

the tiger mother received numerous death threats, certainly not from realizing the "flaws" of her ways.

if she later changed her tune to see "flaws", that's news to me, as i haven't followed her story since the first week. care to post links?

 

[al981]

Why do you continue to talk about your family?

when you address the uncle beating video and quit ducking, then talk, son.

 

[al981]

So the concept of "proportional response" is completely lost on you.

you mean repeated thefts and jeopardizing the entire family's financial health doesn't deserve strict discipline? color me shocked.

I don't know if he can be charged. My doubt is simply in whether someone will try.

LoL! why don't you try, since you think the uncle is so obviously in the wrong and crossed the line with "obvious" child abuse? he can't hide since it's all over youtube.

If it were up to me, both of these guys, the judge and the uncle, wouldn't have functioning balls by the time I'm done with them.

Yeah, you do that. Once you grow a pair of balls yourself and report the uncle to the police for his oh so obvious child abuse, right? Assuming the police don't laugh you out of the station

 

[al981]

It's really not. You attempt to refute the statements of a professional prosecutor by linking to Youtube, and a video from an account registered in another state that's governed by different child abuse laws no less to go along with your internet lawyering. Don't mistake my mockery of you for anything else, I'm just pointing out how dumb your argument is and nothing more.

I don't really have anything else to add, because you haven't added anything worthy of discussion. If you want me to keep making fun of you and telling you how stupid you are though, I can keep it up almost indefinitely.

Let me know.

All good, we get it. you'll continue ducking the uncle beating video until the end of time because it weakens your claims of abuse.

let me know when you grow a pair and have the guts to address it.

 

[cwjerome]

no excuses. the judge's physical whippings were no different than what the uncle gave his nephew. just pointing out your hypocritcal responses.

Nothing hypocritical here, I believe they are different. Some smaller differences include the fact she's a female. I don't give a shit if it's old fashioned or prejudicial, you just don't beat girls like that. You have it backwards... only a major pussy would do that to a female, there's your pussification. She also has a handicap, which should be factored into the mix. Plus, it's proportional... the guy was flirting with gang activity and needed a fairly strong message to keep him from making some extremely bad life decisions. The girl committed a random petty offense and got her ass beat for it.

More importantly the girl got beat for a longer time but the main thing is the state of the victim. In other words, do the actions result in harm? For the boy I would say probably no and for the girl I would say yes. The boy was a little shook up after his minute or so of yelling and some hits but was basically fine. What the girl went through in her 15+ minute ordeal obviously had a great negative effect on her, rising to the level of abuse.

I'm not a lawyer, but if I were a cop/judge in the boy's situation I would have told the uncle that he better be careful because he's skirting a fine line... a warning. In the girl's situation I definitely would have taken the father in and had him get some probation, maybe a fine if it applies, and serious parenting/anger classes.

You can disagree, call it pussification, it doesn't matter... you seem like an idiot anyway, but you have yet to explain how they are the same. I gave my reasoning, whether you agree or not, it's there. You keep bringing up the uncle video like proof of something yet haven't told anyone why they are the same. Let's here it.

 

[zsdersw]

you mean repeated thefts and jeopardizing the entire family's financial health doesn't deserve strict discipline? color me shocked.

Strict discipline != what the judge did.

LoL! why don't you try, since you think the uncle is so obviously in the wrong and crossed the line with "obvious" child abuse? he can't hide since it's all over youtube.

I think the uncle needs to be met with a swing of a Louisville Slugger.. from Prince Fielder.

Yeah, you do that. Once you grow a pair of balls yourself and report the uncle to the police for his oh so obvious child abuse, right? Assuming the police don't laugh you out of the station

I have more of a problem with the judge because his tone and supposed justifications.. not to mention it's a female he's beating.. seem more malicious. But both would get severe physical retribution from me for what they did.

 

[wayliff]

Update:
Texas Judge Videotaped Beating Daughter Is Suspended With Pay

LINK

 

[Macamus Prime]

Update:
Texas Judge Videotaped Beating Daughter Is Suspended With Pay

LINK

The judge's best friends on these forums will help him out by sending their own children to get abused.

This is like Charlie Sheen worship, all over again.

 

[cybrsage]

Stuff like this seriously tests my restraint to take "an eye for an eye".

Interesting aside...did you know that the Jewish "an eye for an eye" was actually a maximum limit? With the amount of barbarism in the world at that time, most cultures accepted you taking out both eyes of a person if they purposefully took out one of yours. One to make it even and the other as punishment.

The Jews made the punishment equal to the crime with this phrase, where there were not already listed punishments for crimes.