Data files on networked laptop & desktop in synch

dougjnn

Senior member
Dec 31, 2000
474
0
0
I'm build a honking desktop. I have a nicely functioning fast home networking setup 10/100 LinkSys).

What I want to do is keep the data files on the laptop and the desktop, or most of them, in synch on a daily basis. Overnight if necessary. 2 gigs data probably, although obviously way less than that changes each day.

By data files I mean a lot more than "My Documents". I mean favorites, probably cookies, Outlook 98 pst files, my downloaded web info (the whole 0 Info folder on both computers), all my downloaded programs and drivers in their compressed first arrived state (in the "9Downloads" on both computers), digital photos, mp3's, etc. I know where the stuff is, or can find it.

I suppose the "My Briefcase" is supposed to do something like this, but it seems like it's designed for floppy sneakernet transfers of a few files. Not really sure. Never played around with it and it looks rather kludgy.

Although maybe it's up to the task with a fast network connect.

What about this "Shared folders" thing Microsoft has.

Well, as you can see I'm pretty clueless here.

Some of you have got to be doing something like this.

Thank!!!

(Oh, by In Synch, ideally I mean this: the state of the folders in question will on source machine A will be exactly recreated on target machine B, including any deletions or renamings or other reorganizations. I don't want the synching to simply add anything that B doesn't have, without pruning what I pruned from machine A in that folder and subfolders, if they are on the synch list.)

 

aUt0eXebat

Banned
Oct 9, 2000
2,353
0
0
Win95-98-ME has a thing called Syncranzation... it checks to see if each file (the 2 same files) a re eqaul (each bit) and if there not, the most recent file thats been updated will update the one that hasnt been... Windows 2000 has modified it alot, and it workes better.
 

jaywallen

Golden Member
Sep 24, 2000
1,227
0
0
Or, if you like doing things manually, you could use a directory / file comparison utility like Beyond Compare from Scooter Software.

You're right to be suspcious of Briefcase.
 

Workin'

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
5,309
0
0
Briefcase sucks.

Windows 2000 has much better file synchronization. I use it to keep my laptop synched with my desktop.

Assuming your laptop has Win2k - Just open Windows Exploder (oops, I mean Explorer), navigate over to the folder on the desktop machine you want to keep synched, right click, and choose "make available off line" and badaboom badabing you will synch right up. You can set options to do it at logon, logoff, on your command, or at certain time intervals.
 

dougjnn

Senior member
Dec 31, 2000
474
0
0
What if my laptop has win98se? That's what it has now.

Don't know if I should move the laptop over to win2k or not. 128mg ram. It may or may not work driver wise. I bet it does. But will I get a performance hit at 128meg (only) of ram, given I'm a mad # of windows open sort of user?
 

Workin'

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
5,309
0
0
<rambling a little off-topic>

My laptop is an IBM ThinkPad 760XL of circa-1997 vintage. It's a P166MMX and has 104MB RAM and a 6GB HD. Windows 2000 runs perfectly well on it. All the drivers it needed came with Win2k, except for the ThinkPad configuration utility, and IBM had an up-to-date version of that ready to download. Actually, Win2k runs better than 98SE did - under 98SE, much of the power management stuff didn't work right, and hibernate (aka suspend-to-disk) did not work. All that stuff (and everything else) works fine with Win2k. I have a 150MB FAT32 partition on the HD for the hibernate file, the rest of the disk is NTFS.

But if you stay with 98SE you are stuck with briefcase or 3rd-party apps.
 

jaywallen

Golden Member
Sep 24, 2000
1,227
0
0
IMO 128 MB of RAM is enough for most users under W2K. You say you use a LOT of open windows, well with 128 MB that will mean some swapping. Notebook hard drives are not known for white-knuckle speed. You might want to boost that to 256 MB if the notebook has provision for it. Of course the most basic consideration is going to be the old Hardware Compatibility List. It's especially important on notebooks because of the way so many devices are integrated into the system design -- often with some alterations from the device's standard format made by the vendor. For instance, Dell uses ATI video subsystems in many of its portables. Sometimes the standard ATI drivers for a given subsystem like a Rage Pro won't work so well with the notebook version. If I were you, I'd check with the notebook's vendor to see if the notebook is made available with W2K (or at least supported under W2K). I don't know much about your notebook's specs. I'm using a Dell Inspiron 7500 with a 500 MHz PIII, a 12 gig Fujitsu HD and 128 MB RAM (soon to be upped to 256 MB -- YIPPEE!). I've done some moderate optimizing but kept most services running. System has Office, MSDE, PGP, firewall, 2 AV programs running on it. Takes about 4 minutes to boot. But normal operations are very spry, as long as I'm not swapping out to the drive.

If you have to stick with Win98SE, you might consider using a file/directory comparison program like I suggested before. The good ones are easy to set up, and comparisons / updates are quick. If you go this way, do watch out for the differences in the way NTFS and FAT/FAT32 partitions record time. There are settings on the good programs that allow you to ignore 2 sec. differentials as well as 1 hour differentials in the date/time stamps of files.

Regards,
Jim