Dan reviews Samsung SyncMaster 172T and he has a rather interesting conclusion

[Czar]

http://www.dansdata.com/sm172t.htm

be surprised on your own 🙂

*goes back to thinking if buying a 1900fp is a good idea or not*

 

[GnomeCop]

what... that was like a more detailed "why I hate LCDs thread" you can find around here all the time 🙂
It was not blindly biased towards LCDs, but he does seem to enjoy pointing out the shortcomings of LCDs.

 

[Mday]

16ms or faster response time recommended for gamers. that is all.

 

[JZilla]

A simple calculation suggests that a 25ms-response LCD can clearly display 40 black-white-black transitions per second, which is 120 frames per second if all you're looking at is alternating black and white frames.

Isn't this wrong? Isn't it just 1000/25ms= 40fps, and not 1000/25ms = 40fps X 3 (black-white-black) = 120fps.

 

[Czar]

bump

 

[RichieZ]

Well I sure as heck didn't buy my 1900FP to play games. I bought it because I like the fact its so easy on the eyes. I can code and write stuff all day w/o getting a headache or eye strain. Try that with my old 20" Trinitron and I'd be popping tylenol.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: JZilla

A simple calculation suggests that a 25ms-response LCD can clearly display 40 black-white-black transitions per second, which is 120 frames per second if all you're looking at is alternating black and white frames.

Isn't this wrong? Isn't it just 1000/25ms= 40fps, and not 1000/25ms = 40fps X 3 (black-white-black) = 120fps.

says this now:

A simple calculation suggests that a 25ms-response LCD can clearly display 40 black-white-black transitions per second, which is 80 frames per second if all you're looking at is alternating black and white frames.

which is right.

 

[Confused]

Did anyone else read that and get the following?

Moan bitch moan blur blur moan moan bitch moan blur bitch blur stuck blur sharp blur moan moan blur bitch blur



?


Confused