Daley won't run for re-election: 'I have done my best'

Wheatmaster

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2002
3,882
0
0
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/09/daley-says-he-will-not-run-for-re-election.html

Daley won't run for re-election: 'I have done my best'
September 7, 2010 3:20 PM | No Comments | BREAKING STORY

Mayor Richard Daley, with his wife and members of his family, speaks at a City Hall press conference to announce that he will not run for re-election in 2011. (Antonio Dickey / Mayor's Press Office) | MORE PHOTOS

Mayor Richard Daley says he will not run for re-election in 2011, saying it's "time for me, it's time for Chicago to move on."

"The truth is I have been thinking about this for the past several months," Daley said at a City Hall news conference that stunned the city. "In the end this is a personal decision, no more, no less."

His wife Maggie stood by his side with the help of a crutch, smiling broadly as the mayor continued: "I have always known that people want you to work hard for them. Clearly, they won't always agree with you. Obviously, they don't like it when you make a mistake. But at all times, they expect you to lead, to make difficult decisions, rooted in what's right for them.

"For 21 years, that's what I've tried to do," he said. "But today, I am announcing that I will not seek a 7th term as mayor of the city of Chicago.

"Simply put, it's time," said Daley, 68. "Time for me, it's time for Chicago to move on."

The mayor said that "improving Chicago has been the ongoing work of my life and I have loved every minute of it. There has been no greater privilege or honor than serving as your mayor.

"Working alongside seasoned professionals, incredibly committed business and community leaders, and some of the most dedicated public employees you will ever expect, I have had the opportunity to expand, to build, to create, unite and compromise for the betterment of Chicago."

"I am deeply grateful to the people of this city, more grateful than I can fully express," Daley said. "I have given it my all. I have done the best.

"Now, I am ready with my family to begin the new phase of our lives. In the coming days, I know there will be some reflecting on my time as mayor. Many of you will search to find what's behind my decision. It's simple. I've always believed that every person, especially public officials, must understand when it's time to move on. For me, that time is now," he said. "The truth is that I've been thinking about this for the last several months. And in the last several weeks, I've been increasingly comfortable with my decision. It just feels right."

"For the next seven months, I assure you I will work as hard as I have for the past 21 years, for all the people of Chicago," he added.

Daley spoke for less than five minutes and took no questions

His announcement comes as he faces a record $655 million budget shortfall. Last month, the mayor said he's looking at hiring private firms to take over more city functions, including potentially running the Taste of Chicago, as a way to cut costs.

Daley limited his options this time around after raising property taxes in 2007, selling off parking meters and raising fees in 2008 and spending reserves last year. The mayor reiterated late last month that he won't be increasing taxes or fees or auctioning off more city assets.

The mayor joins at least a half-dozen aldermen who already have said they won't seek re-election next year.

His decision also comes as Maggie continues to battle cancer. In March, she underwent surgery to strengthen a leg damaged by cancer and the resulting treatment.

The city's first lady has been battling metastatic breast cancer since 2002. In December, the mayor announced his wife would use a wheelchair to get around while undergoing radiation treatment for a cancerous bone tumor on her right leg.

Daley's decision sets off a major power scramble following more than 20 years of stifled political ambitions in city politics.

Daley was first elected mayor in 1989 following a failed bid in 1983. The mayor won re-election every four years since then, always with little to no opposition.

But Daley's public approval rating had dipped recently, with a Tribune poll earlier this summer showing that more than half of Chicago voters said they don't want to see him re-elected.

The poll found only 37 percent of city voters approve of the job Daley is doing as mayor, compared with 47 percent who disapprove. Moreover, a record-low 31 percent said they want to see Daley re-elected, compared with 53 percent who don't want him to win another term.

The mayor's administration has been buffeted by a spate of summer violence, a weak economy and a high-profile failure to land the 2016 Olympics. Dissatisfaction abounds, the survey found, over Daley's handling of the crime problem, his efforts to rein in government corruption and his backing of a controversial long-term parking meter system lease.

A few aldermen are shopping themselves around as potential candidates, and some politicians with broader political bases have been glad to see their names tossed into the ring -- but none had shown a willingness to challenge Daley.

Among aldermen discussed as potential mayoral candidates are Robert Fioretti, 2nd; Sandi Jackson, 7th; Thomas Allen, 38th; Scott Waguespack, 32nd; Brendan Reilly, 42nd; and Thomas Tunney, 44th.

Earlier this year, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel voiced his mayoral ambitions. But the former North Side congressman quickly added that he wouldn't take on Daley, for whom he served as a strategist and fundraiser in the mayor's first winning bid. Likewise, Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart said he won't run for mayor unless the office is open.

Outgoing Cook County Assessor James Houlihan, by contrast, was considered a potential candidate whether or not Daley runs again. Former Chicago Inspector General David Hoffman also has been mentioned, but he just lost a grueling Democratic U.S. Senate primary.

-- John Byrne
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,396
47,817
136
I think this will end up (eventually) being a good thing for the city of Chicago.

I'm not so certain. Daley, for all his strengths and flaws, has been a source of great stability to the city for two decades.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
"Last month, the mayor said he's looking at hiring private firms to take over more city functions, "


yeah great idea. that worked so damn well with the parking meters
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
In terms of additional information, its now rumored the Rahm Emanueal, Obama's chief of staff may try to run for Chicago mayor.

Who will take over from Daley will be an interesting race to watch.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,396
47,817
136
In terms of additional information, its now rumored the Rahm Emanueal, Obama's chief of staff may try to run for Chicago mayor.

Who will take over from Daley will be an interesting race to watch.

He's the odds on favorite. He and Daley have always been closely aligned. I think it unlikely that da mayor hasn't given long and hard thought to his potential successor. Plus Emanuael has been a figure in local politics for quite some time and always easily carried his district.
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
I guess I am confusing the mayors with governors.. :) I'm sure the mayors are completely on the up and up.. ():)

David Vitter likes the prostitutes... that means that all senators and politicians in the LA like prostitutes too.. Got it...
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
Really? Saying Chicago politicians are corrupt is shocking to you?

While there have been many in the past generalizing that all of them are corrupt makes you look like a simpleton..

There are crooked politicians in NYC, Seattle, every single city and state of the union. Chicago politicians have crashed and burned very publicly because of the size of the media market and the political weight of the seriously egregious like rosty etc...



Many bigots and racists burned crosses and set fires to churches in the south so all southerners are bigots.. does that seem fair?


Your simple world is nothing like reality. Enjoy it!!!
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
While there have been many in the past generalizing that all of them are corrupt makes you look like a simpleton..

There are crooked politicians in NYC, Seattle, every single city and state of the union. Chicago politicians have crashed and burned very publicly because of the size of the media market and the political weight of the seriously egregious like rosty etc...



Many bigots and racists burned crosses and set fires to churches in the south so all southerners are bigots.. does that seem fair?


Your simple world is nothing like reality. Enjoy it!!!

I'd say that saying all of them are corrupt is damn near 100% accurate.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
I'd say the chances of finding a non-crooked politician in Chicago or Illinois are just about zero. I'm sure Rahm will fit right in.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
While there have been many in the past generalizing that all of them are corrupt makes you look like a simpleton..

There are crooked politicians in NYC, Seattle, every single city and state of the union. Chicago politicians have crashed and burned very publicly because of the size of the media market and the political weight of the seriously egregious like rosty etc...



Many bigots and racists burned crosses and set fires to churches in the south so all southerners are bigots.. does that seem fair?


Your simple world is nothing like reality. Enjoy it!!!

Do you know that some terrorists are bad people?

In the non-hypothetical world city politics are filth. Chicago has a time honored tradition of corruption, illegal influence, graft, you name it. If you don't play the game you get nowhere because the system ensures that to be the case. The honest politician has one term and you never heard of him.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,990
1,724
126
wow...someone is actually trying to generalize that Chicago politicians are not corrupt??

PT Barnum was right...