Daisy chain switches or bash a hole in my wall?

bdunosk

Senior member
Sep 26, 2000
573
2
81
My house is wired with CAT6 from the basement where the cable model feeds an 8-port unmanaged switch that distributes out to the rest of the house. I only have one line running to my office, which has 2 computers. The hole through which the wire is fed from the basement into the office is impossibly small and hard to access from below... before I pound a hole in my office to try to feed the wire from above, how bad would it be to just put another switch in my office to hard wire the 2 computers in there?

Thanks in advance.
 

RadiclDreamer

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2004
8,622
40
91
Second switch, in high performance networks you should try to minimize doing so, but I doubt its going to make any perceptable difference
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
68,457
12,611
126
www.anyf.ca
I typically like to have all home runs, but in your case putting a switch is acceptable. Just make sure you put it on a UPS or that segment of the network will go down immediately if the power goes out.
 

FrankSchwab

Senior member
Nov 8, 2002
218
0
0
Unless the two machines are in use simultaneously, pounding bits out to different machines at full line rate, you'll see (and be able to measure) precisely zero difference between having a second switch, and having two lines to the first switch.

Get a second $20 gigabit switch, and call it a day.
 

bdunosk

Senior member
Sep 26, 2000
573
2
81
The switch arrived and is installed, as you all said there is no noticeable ill effects. Thanks for saving my wall undue harm and hours of frustration. :)
 

azazel1024

Senior member
Jan 6, 2014
901
2
76
Might get additional latency... like 2 ms or so :D

Not even. Store and forward on fast ethernet is roughly 120us, unless there is something badly wrong with the switch. If it is gigabit, its 12us. That's how much time it takes for a packet to get transmitted fully to the switch and stored and then kicked on by the switch.

So unless something is going badly wrong, you are talking sub milisecone latency from an added switch. It should only really be an issue for

1) Added electrical bill costs, but a simple fast ethernet or even gigabit 5 port switch probably uses 1-3w of power with only 2 ports up and working.

2) You need fat pipes, but if all you are doing is running both machines to the basement switch out ot the internet, not a concern, as they are sharing the same final pipe anyway. It may only be an issue if, for instance, you had a server + internet and one machine was hammering the server, that could limit the throughput possible to the internet for the other machines or vice versa (or both are limited to a small degree).

No matter, you aren't likely to be looking at a real limitation for most people's network designs.