Dad Wears Nazi Uniform For Child Custody Case

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
http://news.sky.com/story/1099172/dad-wears-nazi-uniform-for-child-custody-case

Dad Wears Nazi Uniform For Child Custody Case

Heath Campbell, who named one of his children Adolf Hitler, tells a New Jersey court he wants to prove to he is "a good father".

A man who gave his children Nazi-inspired names has dressed up in full fascist regalia as he appeared in a US court seeking to secure visitation rights to his youngest son.

Heath Campbell - father of Adolf Hitler Campbell, 7, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, 6, Honzlynn Jeannie Campbell, 5, and 18-month-old Heinrich Hons Campbell - donned a German Nazi uniform for the hearing in Flemington, New Jersey.

The 40-year-old, who also sports a large swastika tattoo on his neck, was appearing before the court in a bid to win the right to see Heinrich Hons, who was taken into care by social services soon after his birth in November 2011.

Heinrich's elder siblings had already been taken into care in 2009.

"I'm going to tell the judge I love my children. I wanna be a father, let me be it," Mr Campbell told NBC10 before the hearing.


The family hit the headlines in 2008 when a supermarket refused to write Adolf Hitler on a cake ordered for their eldest son.

However, Mr Campbell rejected claims by social workers that he had been violent towards his children in the past.

"Let me prove to the world that I am a good father," he said.

"I've never abused my children, I only name my children and I don't think it's right any more.

"Basically, what they're saying is because of my beliefs and I'm a Nazi, that us people don't have any constitutional rights to fight for our children."

Asked whether dressing up as a Nazi was likely to help his case, Mr Campbell was confident it would not be held against him: "If they're good judges and they're good people, they'll look within, not what's on the outside."
heath-campbell.jpg




It's refreshing when the loonies don't even try and hide it.
 

Uppsala9496

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 2001
5,272
19
81
"Basically, what they're saying is because of my beliefs and I'm a Nazi, that us people don't have any constitutional rights to fight for our children."

Yes, because Nazi's believed in American constitutional rights. What a fool.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
He could have really used some good legal advice. Too bad he shot all the lawyers.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
the fact he is a "Nazi" and has such beleifs should not have anything to do with if he can raise his children or not. he does have freedom of speech.

the accusation of him abusing his children on the other hand should be proven. if not then they need to give the children back.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,041
14,446
146
Good for them. While I think they're batshit crazy, they have a right to be batshit crazy.

This should fall under "freedom of religion."
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
"Basically, what they're saying is because of my beliefs and I'm a Nazi, that us people don't have any constitutional rights to fight for our children."

Yes, because Nazi's believed in American constitutional rights. What a fool.

Well, that, and there's no actual constitutional right to fight for your children. If fact, there is no constitutional right related to parenting. Ergo, this is a state issue. Now, I guess he could have meant "state constitutional right", but I doubt it.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
I'm all for free speech and free expression. But I'm also a supporter of evolution and natural selection. Nazism had its chance and nature selected it for extinction. Attempting to indoctrinate your children with an ideology that is not acceptable anywhere on Earth is a waste of time, and absolutely qualifies as child abuse in my eyes.

Also, dressing up as the greatest villain in the history of the country isn't a good way to endear anyone to your cause. What a fucking moron.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
the fact he is a "Nazi" and has such beleifs should not have anything to do with if he can raise his children or not. he does have freedom of speech.

the accusation of him abusing his children on the other hand should be proven. if not then they need to give the children back.

Does freedom of speech extend to naming children? The state determines the boundaries of child names, if I'm not mistaken.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Should just carve a swastika in his forehead, Landa-style. Fucking moron pos.

KT
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Attempting to indoctrinate your children with an ideology that is not acceptable anywhere on Earth is a waste of time, and absolutely qualifies as child abuse in my eyes.

You can't really mean that. Remember, there was a time when Democracy was born.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
Should just carve a swastika in his forehead, Landa-style. Fucking moron pos.

KT

They only did that to the Nazis who weren't going to wear their uniforms anymore. This guy clearly has no problem wearing his in public; I don't think anyone will have trouble identifying the Nazi when he's around. Now a scalping, that might have some better results...
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
You can't really mean that. Remember, there was a time when Democracy was born.

No, I mean it. I think that if you're indoctrinating your children with hate speech, you're guilty of mental abuse. Keep in mind, he's brainwashing kids with an ideology that was deemed to be guilty of war crimes and some of the greatest atrocities in the history of human civilization. He named his kid "Adolf Hitler." How can that child possibly expect to have a normal life in a country where his namesake is universally regarded as the most evil man in history? That's abusive, and it isn't fair to the children he's fathered. If they want to become Nazis later in life, fine, let them, but don't let their innocent minds be corrupted by a lunatic.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
They only did that to the Nazis who weren't going to wear their uniforms anymore. This guy clearly has no problem wearing his in public; I don't think anyone will have trouble identifying the Nazi when he's around. Now a scalping, that might have some better results...

What if the dry cleaner loses his uniform? Better safe than sorry.

KT
 

Mixolydian

Lifer
Nov 7, 2011
14,566
91
91
gilramirez.net
Lots of craziness found, but doesn't seem like the kind of crazy that would really "screw up" the kids for life. Doesn't seem any different than having ultra-religious nutjob parents.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
No, I mean it. I think that if you're indoctrinating your children with hate speech, you're guilty of mental abuse. Keep in mind, he's brainwashing kids with an ideology that was deemed to be guilty of war crimes and some of the greatest atrocities in the history of human civilization. He named his kid "Adolf Hitler." How can that child possibly expect to have a normal life in a country where his namesake is universally regarded as the most evil man in history? That's abusive, and it isn't fair to the children he's fathered. If they want to become Nazis later in life, fine, let them, but don't let their innocent minds be corrupted by a lunatic.

I took your statement to be general in nature, when it was actually specific to Nazism. Understood.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
What if the dry cleaner loses his uniform? Better safe than sorry.

KT

Do you think he has to lie to dry cleaners to get them to take it? Like tell them it's a costume for a local theater production of Downfall or something? I can't imagine most dry cleaners would be thrilled about cleaning a Nazi uniform.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Does freedom of speech extend to naming children? The state determines the boundaries of child names, if I'm not mistaken.

care to point to me where the state has a say in what person names a child? and a list that has Adolf banned?


as disgusting as these people are NO they should not lose the kids based on names or beliefs.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
Lots of craziness found, but doesn't seem like the kind of crazy that would really "screw up" the kids for life. Doesn't seem any different than having ultra-religious nutjob parents.

Based on what I've learned from the media, I'm pretty sure that raising a kid as a Nazi winds up with him turning into Edward Furlong. Nobody wants that.
 

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
care to point to me where the state has a say in what person names a child? and a list that has Adolf banned?


as disgusting as these people are NO they should not lose the kids based on names or beliefs.

Agreed.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,876
11,018
136
That guy is undoubtedly an idiot and a complete dick head but I'm not sure that he should of had his kids taken away over this.
It's one thing if he's causing them physical harm, just instilling in them an ideology that most right thinking people find objectionable seems to be setting the bar dangerously low. There's definitely a slippery slope there to be wary of.