DACA flight attendant detained by ICE after working flight to Mexico??

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,668
10,391
136
Ok, not sure why this story hasn't blown up already, but apparently ICE is starting detentions and deportations for DACA recipients? This makes me sick... I'm somewhat surprised this story broke with TPG though, so withholding final judgement until I see news media corroborate. If true, however, put me firmly in the "abolish ICE" camp.

Cliffs: She's been in the US since she was 3, went to college here, has a social security number, married a citizen, got a job, pays taxes...and had been in detention for 40 days and is about to be deported to Peru, all because she listened to her employer when they said working a flight to Mexico was no big deal.

https://thepointsguy.com/news/ice-detains-flight-attendant-daca/

--

Selene Saavedra Roman, 28, a resident of College Station, Texas, had been a crew member for Phoenix-based Mesa Airlines for less than a month in February when she was scheduled for a flight to Mexico out of Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH), even though she’d already made it clear that she didn’t want to work any flights outside the US.

Saavedra immediately told her supervisors she was worried — she was, after all, a so-called Dreamer, one of an estimated 700,000 immigrants to the US who fall under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy. Saavedra came illegally to the US from Peru when she was 3 years old, grew up in Dallas, went to college in Texas, and married a US citizen. She has a Social Security number and pays taxes, and was halfway through the process of getting her official citizenship. Leaving the country, she feared, could jeopardize her DACA status.

But Mesa Airlines insisted she was legally all right to fly to Mexico and back.

“She should be okay because it’s part of DACA as long as it is not expiring,” a supervisor at Mesa wrote in an email reviewed by The Points Guy.

Saavedra’s DACA status is good until November 2019, according to a Department of Homeland Security notice also seen by TPG. And though the legal battle continues over whether the Trump administration can revoke the policy or not, a federal judge ruled in August 2018 that the policy could continue for now.

According to her husband David Watkins, Saavedra agreed to work the flight because she was a new hire, still on probation at the airline and was afraid she might lose the job she’d just gotten.

Saavedra flew to Mexico out of Houston on February 12, using a Peruvian passport, then got on a return flight for an immediate turnaround. It was the first time she’d left the States since she’d entered it as a child. When she went through customs, officials told her her paperwork wasn’t in order and pulled her aside.

She ended up being held at the Houston airport for 24 hours, then Immigrations and Customs Enforcement transferred her to a privately run immigration detention facility in Conroe, Texas, one of several that have sprouted up in the past couple of years to cope with the administration’s restrictive border policies.

“She spent Valentine’s Day in prison, I know that,” Watkins said in a telephone interview. “They’re only allowed outside once a week, like in a concrete courtyard where I guess they can look at the sky, and maybe they have grass. She wakes up at 6 for chow, and it’s lights out at 10:30pm, and it’s all about the other prisoners trying not to tear each other apart. I can visit her for an hour once a week, but I can’t bring her books or photos, and it’s through two inches of glass. I mean, yeah, it’s a prison.”
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,905
6,788
126
I am voting for the Democrat that promises that Mexico will pay to build Trumps prison.
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
TPG is the queen of clickbait. I'll reserve any judgement until someone can show this from reputable media.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,668
10,391
136
She's obviously MS13 and going to pillage white neighborhoods if allowed back.

Yup, she's got those stone cold killer eyes:

89dd7a887e288bcc61136b906855d1d4.jpg
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,668
10,391
136
CBP in this case but yes.

Sounds like CBP had a process in place to deal with that situation...not sure what changed in 2019 but based on this quote from the article it seems like the administration/higher ups have put that process on hold. Again...need a real reporter to look into this.

"According to Arroyo, immigration officials at Houston airport previously would have granted Saavedra a parole — a legal exception that would have allowed her, as a DACA recipient, to leave and reenter the country without hassle. But because of DACA’s legal limbo, it’s not clear whether paroles still apply."
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
16,601
11,410
136
Sounds like CBP had a process in place to deal with that situation...not sure what changed in 2019 but based on this quote from the article it seems like the administration/higher ups have put that process on hold. Again...need a real reporter to look into this.

"According to Arroyo, immigration officials at Houston airport previously would have granted Saavedra a parole — a legal exception that would have allowed her, as a DACA recipient, to leave and reenter the country without hassle. But because of DACA’s legal limbo, it’s not clear whether paroles still apply."

I read the article but I think the problem is she used her Peruvian passport. She shoulda used the parole document.. clearly she wasn't informed by her employer or by someone else.

I think this only ends in 3 ways.. Congress DACA Resolution, SCOTUS victory, or her deportation.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,627
48,191
136
I read the article but I think the problem is she used her Peruvian passport. She shoulda used the parole document.. clearly she wasn't informed by her employer or by someone else.

I think this only ends in 3 ways.. Congress DACA Resolution, SCOTUS victory, or her deportation.

In this spirit I endorse summary capital punishment for anyone in the wrong line at the DMV. #NationOfLaws
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
More CBP shenanigans...I guess ICE isn't alone in going full deplorable:

787c7cac2571f4ba026dd2f3c5af0aa6.jpg
This article brings up another issue, why is one considered fraud and punishable by jail time while one is acceptable.
Thousands of children are believed to live in Mexico and attend schools in Arizona, California, Texas and New Mexico.

To enroll, they often use an address of a relative or friend who lives near a public school.

They are US citizens and obtained passports by being born in the States.

Their presence divides opinion. Some believe the children are entitled to the same education as any other kid living in the US.

Others think it is unfair that they should be able to take advantage of free schooling when their families do not pay US tax dollars.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ther-sentenced-to-jail-for-enrolling-child-in
Kelley Williams-Bolar was convicted in January 2011 of two felony records tampering charges. The Akron mother lied and used her father’s address to illegally enroll her two daughters into the Copley-Fairlawn School District and spent nine days in jail.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
This article brings up another issue, why is one considered fraud and punishable by jail time while one is acceptable.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ther-sentenced-to-jail-for-enrolling-child-in
Kelley Williams-Bolar was convicted in January 2011 of two felony records tampering charges. The Akron mother lied and used her father’s address to illegally enroll her two daughters into the Copley-Fairlawn School District and spent nine days in jail.


And this has exactly what to do with the OP?

Oh, diversion again. Gotcha.
 

1sikbITCH

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2001
4,194
574
126
Is the 9 year old girl still alive? Can anyone confirm?
This article brings up another issue, why is one considered fraud and punishable by jail time while one is acceptable.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ther-sentenced-to-jail-for-enrolling-child-in
Kelley Williams-Bolar was convicted in January 2011 of two felony records tampering charges. The Akron mother lied and used her father’s address to illegally enroll her two daughters into the Copley-Fairlawn School District and spent nine days in jail.

BUT HIS WHATSAPP
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,668
10,391
136
This article brings up another issue, why is one considered fraud and punishable by jail time while one is acceptable.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ther-sentenced-to-jail-for-enrolling-child-in
Kelley Williams-Bolar was convicted in January 2011 of two felony records tampering charges. The Akron mother lied and used her father’s address to illegally enroll her two daughters into the Copley-Fairlawn School District and spent nine days in jail.

I have no idea why these school districts would allow non-residents access to their schools...but that is very much a local jurisdiction issue. I, for one, would love to enroll my daughter in Wake County public schools vs. Durham public schools. But the mere fact she's a citizen and her parents pay federal taxes has nothing to do with her ability to attend school in that district. If our address isn't zoned for those schools, we're SOL.

I don't think this has anything to do with CBP, ICE or any other topic in this thread. But you knew that already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MagnusTheBrewer

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
This article brings up another issue, why is one considered fraud and punishable by jail time while one is acceptable.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ther-sentenced-to-jail-for-enrolling-child-in
Kelley Williams-Bolar was convicted in January 2011 of two felony records tampering charges. The Akron mother lied and used her father’s address to illegally enroll her two daughters into the Copley-Fairlawn School District and spent nine days in jail.

Excuse me, but you need to link this quote

"Thousands of children are believed to live in Mexico and attend schools in Arizona, California, Texas and New Mexico.

To enroll, they often use an address of a relative or friend who lives near a public school.

They are US citizens and obtained passports by being born in the States.

Their presence divides opinion. Some believe the children are entitled to the same education as any other kid living in the US.

Others think it is unfair that they should be able to take advantage of free schooling when their families do not pay US tax dollars "

Believed by whom, exactly?