D²OL Stats & MMs 01/22

[GeoffS]

** TEAM STANDINGS **

Rank..Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Yest (Rank) . . . . Tot.Cands. . . . TA Lead . . . . Delta Daily
. .1. . .Team AnandTech. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3044 (1). . . . . 655487
. .2. . .Dutch Power Cows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2135 (2) . . . . 609208 . . . . . . . . 46279 . . . . . . . . 1290
. .3. . .BIOHazard Research Group Italy. . . . . . 182 (11) . . . . 374153 . . . . . . . . 281334 . . . . . . . . 2875
. .4. . .Team USA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1660 (3) . . . . 334535 . . . . . . . . 320952 . . . . . . . . 1941
. .5. . .Ars Technica Team Frozen Yogurt. . . . . 340 (8) . . . . 320753 . . . . . . . . 334734 . . . . . . . . 2722
. .6. . .hardCOREware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1505 (4) . . . . 232002 . . . . . . . . 423485 . . . . . . . . 1627
. .7. . .TechIMO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 (7) . . . . 157302 . . . . . . . . 498185 . . . . . . . . 2738
. .8. . .Rechenkraft.net - Germany. . . . . . . . . . 172 (12) . . . . 149493 . . . . . . . . 505994 . . . . . . . . 2837
. .9. . .Team MacNN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (53) . . . . 129432 . . . . . . . . 526055 . . . . . . . . 2970
. 10. . .SAKnet.org &[Liberty]NTWasted. . . . . . 85 (21) . . . . 101180 . . . . . . . . 554307 . . . . . . . . 2960

Positive Delta Daily means that we are outproducing that team. Negative means they are gaining on us. This number is derived from the difference between rolling last week productions divided by 7 to get a daily figure.


** MILESTONE MAKERS **

No MMs today because I ran yesterday's stats against the data I had at around 10am EST. The Daily Stats numbers below are also reflecting work done since that time.


DAILY STATS
There are 123 members on the TeAm, 22 flushed yesterday (17.9%). Great job TeAm!

Rank...Name. . . . . . . . . . . . Yesterday . . . . . . . Total
4. . . . .TA_GeoffS. . . . . . . . . . . 468 (2) . . . . . . .91506
15. . . .TA_DIESEL. . . . . . . . . . . 177 (10) . . . . . . .50310
17. . . .TA_Slapstick_Shame. . . . . . 272 (4) . . . . . . .44641
36. . . .TA_ken008. . . . . . . . . . . 26 (88) . . . . . . .22734
65. . . .TA_andy. . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (32) . . . . . . .14849
99. . . .TA_Vader2K. . . . . . . . . . 47 (28) . . . . . . .9865
104. . . TA_TheReaper. . . . . . . . . 44 (24) . . . . . . .9742
114. . . Draveed. . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (37) . . . . . . .8776
115. . . ApplePi. . . . . . . . . . . . 51 (27) . . . . . . .8762
116. . . TA_InverseofNeo. . . . . . . . 21 (53) . . . . . . .8659
129. . . TA_strider7. . . . . . . . . . 12 (85) . . . . . . .7929
221. . . JarsOfFart. . . . . . . . . . 68 (23) . . . . . . .4950
228. . . Carrot39. . . . . . . . . . . 29 (43) . . . . . . .4781
234. . . TA_Kk4Jc. . . . . . . . . . . 29 (52) . . . . . . .4638
243. . . TA_FoBoT. . . . . . . . . . . 9 (92) . . . . . . .4453
301. . . TA_Artemedes. . . . . . . . . 67 (31) . . . . . . .3623
312. . . TA_Night201. . . . . . . . . . 35 (57) . . . . . . .3389
357. . . siliconghost. . . . . . . . . 9 (123) . . . . . . .2758
389. . . TA_bfour. . . . . . . . . . . 3 (166) . . . . . . .2446
402. . . WTT0001. . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (104) . . . . . . .2315
498. . . justbeez. . . . . . . . . . . 10 (75) . . . . . . .1597
685. . . Titansfury. . . . . . . . . . 3 (122) . . . . . . .933

 

[TAandy]

Thanks for the stats, Geoff.
(Only 32 ???) :disgust:

 

[InverseOfNeo]

Originally posted by: andyjones
Thanks for the stats, Geoff. (Only 32 ???) :disgust:

I think that numbers have been down for all of us. I usually do about 100-110 a day and for the past few days my production has been about one-fifth of that. Tough cands or did Sengent lose our work?:|

 

[TAandy]

Originally posted by: InverseOfNeo

Originally posted by: andyjones
Thanks for the stats, Geoff. (Only 32 ???) :disgust:

I think that numbers have been down for all of us. I usually do about 100-110 a day and for the past few days my production has been about one-fifth of that. Tough cands or did Sengent lose our work?:|

Probably both :|

 

[GeoffS]

Note what I said at the top... these numbers reflect from whenever I posted yesterday through to midnight... not a full day.

And I am finding the new clients to be tougher too... and locking up more machines. There is a thread on the Sengent forum for listing your locked candidates so they will either be fixed or taken out of circulation... pls use it... but don't bother at the moment... I think their servers are in northern Vermont or Minnesota because they are running deathly slow at the moment...

Geoff

 

[TAandy]

Looks like Sengent have lost mayo.
Wasn't he one of the top producers, or am I thinking of somebody else ?

 

[networkman]

No, you're thinking of the right person.. always a bad sign when the #1 producer in a project gives up and leaves - but I fully understand what he was likely dealing with, though I'm sure his fleet was considerably larger and even more difficult to maintain given the various issues than mine.

 

[TAandy]

Maybe I should have said Sengent have lost the plot

 

[GeoffS]

The first top producer to go was the DPC LawnMoherMen... a mini-team as far as I could tell. I believe mayo runs a computer lab which is the source of his herd. Team USA is basically him as the rest of the team doesn't add up to his production. I wouldn't be surprised to se AGGIE go soon too... he is a one-man team and must be getting fed up too, although he is awfully quiet...

Geoff

 

[TAandy]

It's a shame really that these prolific crunchers are leaving as the basic concept of the project is such a good one
I've given them over a year of my PC's time so far so I think they'll have to pull the plug on the project before I quit but sometimes.....

 

[networkman]

Oh yeah, make no mistake - I truly think this is a worthwhile project to be involved with, but for me it's got to be something I can commit resources to and step back to engage in the rest of life; I don't have the time nor the desire to have constantly(several times a day) check to make sure the clients haven't stopped or become stuck or whatever. It's a shame really.

 

[TAandy]

Originally posted by: networkman
Oh yeah, make no mistake - I truly think this is a worthwhile project to be involved with, but for me it's got to be something I can commit resources to and step back to engage in the rest of life; I don't have the time nor the desire to have constantly(several times a day) check to make sure the clients haven't stopped or become stuck or whatever. It's a shame really.

I suppose that's one benefit of having only 1 or 2 PC's to look after

 

[InverseOfNeo]

Originally posted by: networkman
Oh yeah, make no mistake - I truly think this is a worthwhile project to be involved with, but for me it's got to be something I can commit resources to and step back to engage in the rest of life; I don't have the time nor the desire to have constantly(several times a day) check to make sure the clients haven't stopped or become stuck or whatever. It's a shame really.

Ya, I totally understand. Today is the first day I am thinking of leaving. I had hoped to make it to the Top 100 before I thought about this. I flew through the past 80 or so spots but this is getting to be ridiculous. Absolutely no excuse for this. Consider this a fair warning of an abandonement of a project with a great goal.