Cynical Missouri tried to block Obamacare "Navigators"

Status
Not open for further replies.

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Somehow this one slipped through the cracks, but it demonstrates just how far the right will go to block Obamacare.

The essence of this story is that the exact same health insurance advisers that Missouri had been perfectly comfortable with for 24 years in helping people with Medicare issues were subjected to onerous requirements if they wanted to do the same thing for people who wanted to sign up for Obamacare. But a federal judge saw through it.

From January 24:

Federal judge blocks Missouri law restricting Obamacare navigators

A federal judge in Kansas City issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday blocking Missouri's draconian restrictions on Obamacare "navigators." Following a similar decision which ruled that Republican legislation in Tennessee was far too broad, Judge Ortrie B. Smith declared that "that the State of Missouri was illegally obstructing the activities of insurance counselors appointed by the federal government to inform consumers of their options under the Affordable Care Act."

In August, the federal government awarded $67 million in grants to 105 hospitals, community groups and non-profit organizations to provide outreach, information and insurance enrollment assistance to residents of the 34 states which refused to set up their own health insurance exchanges under the Affordable Care Act. But like many other GOP-dominated states, Missouri erected barriers making the navigators work virtually impossible. Among other roadblocks, the Missouri "Health Insurance Marketplace Innovation Act of 2013" bars navigators from offering "advice concerning the benefits, terms, and features of a particular health plan" and "including licensing tests, fines as high as $1,000 and training that almost doubles the hours required by the government."

That, Judge Smith ruled, is clearly illegal. As the New York Times reported:

"The state law obstructs the federal purpose" by imposing onerous restrictions and requirements on people who help consumers, including groups designated as "navigators" under federal law, the judge said...

Judge Smith said that the plaintiffs had already complied with federal rules for insurance counselors, but that the state had imposed a number of additional licensing requirements.

"It seems obvious these additional requirements obstruct the federal government's operation of the federally facilitated exchange," Judge Smith said. For that reason, he said, the state law is pre-empted by the Affordable Care Act, which has supremacy under the federal Constitution.

The Missouri law blocked Thursday isn't just onerous, but more than a little ironic. After all, the entire Obamacare navigator program is modeled on the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) that Medicare has used since 1990. President Bush's Medicare Part D prescription drug program used virtually the same navigator approach even before its launch in 2006. And I documented elsewhere, in Missouri, the Medicare navigators and the Obamacare navigators are literally the same groups:

In Missouri, the two major recipients were Missouri Alliance of Area Agencies on Aging ($750,000) and Primaris Business Health Care Solutions ($1,045,624). These funds were then subcontracted to a host of regional groups and non-profits whose staff and volunteers provide outreach, customer service and enrollment assistance to Missourians seeking health insurance...

You read that right. The same organizations getting federal dollars to help roll-out the Affordable Care Act in Missouri are the same ones that have been getting millions for years from the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP). In Missouri, the non-profit SHIP entity running the Medicare outreach program is called "Community Leaders Assisting the Insured of Missouri" or CLAIM. For Medicare counseling and enrollment help, CLAIM contracted to Primaris, which in turn funds partners like the APPLE Project, Interfaith Community Services and Ozark Action, Inc., just to name a few. And all of those Missouri Medicare navigators are Missouri Obamacare navigators as well.

Legal analysts have suggested that Smith's ruling could ultimately impact similar GOP navigator curbs in eight other states, including Florida, Ohio, Texas and Wisconsin. Meanwhile, back in Missouri Republican State Senator Kurt Schaeffer isreadying a new bill to obstruct the work of Show Me State Obamacare navigators by requiring them to purchase surety bonds of at least $100,000 to protect clients from improper use of their personal data.

Kind of reminds me of all of the new restrictions imposed by red states on abortion clinics in the name of "protecting" women. Truly, Republicans are slime. They don't give a shit about the welfare of people under their jurisdiction; all they're interested in is political games.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,154
55,703
136
Dailykos?

LOL

Fern

It is true that conservative states have been attempting to block navigators from helping their citizens use the exchanges though. It's pretty abominable.

Opposing a law is one thing, cutting your nose to spite your face is just childish though.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Both GA and SC have passed laws that make it a crime to have health providers even direct or mention the ACA to patients.
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
About what I've come to expect out of my state, sad to say.

Glad the judge was able to see through that bullshit bill.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
It is true that conservative states have been attempting to block navigators from helping their citizens use the exchanges though. It's pretty abominable.

Opposing a law is one thing, cutting your nose to spite your face is just childish though.

I mentioned the OP source because it seems to leave out some relevant info.

Weren't there serious concerns about many of the individuals hired in the navigator program? You know things them being felons etc and having access to private data that could be easily used in identity theft? The list goes on..

Strong statements such as this need to be documented:

And I documented elsewhere, in Missouri, the Medicare navigators and the Obamacare navigators are literally the same groups:

The author, at least IMO, is implying that the personnel are the same. I.e., he's arguing against the complaint about the staff and their access to sensitive private data by implying these were the same people assisting in medicare.

Fern
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,154
55,703
136
Are you genuinely trying to say that the reason for these restrictions are because the states think these navigators are felons or whatever?

I don't think you're that naive. You know exactly why.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
Somehow this one slipped through the cracks, but it demonstrates just how far the right will go to block Obamacare.

The essence of this story is that the exact same health insurance advisers that Missouri had been perfectly comfortable with for 24 years in helping people with Medicare issues were subjected to onerous requirements if they wanted to do the same thing for people who wanted to sign up for Obamacare. But a federal judge saw through it.

From January 24:



Kind of reminds me of all of the new restrictions imposed by red states on abortion clinics in the name of "protecting" women. Truly, Republicans are slime. They don't give a shit about the welfare of people under their jurisdiction; all they're interested in is political games.


Oh yes, all these good ole "trap laws" designed to make it so difficult that a woman can't get an abortion or most will give up trying. Yes many of these have been struck down and some are now in court being fought out. I agree, Republican's today are slime.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Let me guess, this judge is probably a card carrying dear leader supporter.... Not surprising.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Are you genuinely trying to say that the reason for these restrictions are because the states think these navigators are felons or whatever?

I don't think you're that naive. You know exactly why.

Biased unbalanced article/blog by a biased author (I've seen some of his other pieces) in a biased site. It's an opinion piece.

Fern
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Let me guess, this judge is probably a card carrying dear leader supporter.... Not surprising.

Let me guess- Righties are desperate for the ACA to fail & will employ any means to make that happen, then apply lame attribution as justification.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Biased unbalanced article/blog by a biased author (I've seen some of his other pieces) in a biased site. It's an opinion piece.

Fern

Puh-leeze. Obvious is obvious, no matter who points it out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.