0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Last edited:

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
Citing the same outlet that has been caught lying multiple times, to the point where the GAO, California's Attorney General and the Washington Post all smacked its dishonest ass.

You know you're not persuading anyone here, right? Project Veritas is anything but what its name implies.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Citing the same outlet that has been caught lying multiple times, to the point where the GAO, California's Attorney General and the Washington Post all smacked its dishonest ass.

You know you're not persuading anyone here, right? Project Veritas is anything but what its name implies.

Again, you are going to have to discredit the whistle blower this time, he is not anonymous.

A standard applied equally, any outlet repeating the 1 in 5 lie, never mind the outlet which helped create it from inception should be disregarded by you if you weren't just applying double standards. But as we know, your only standard is the double standard.

So keep trying to distract, your concern is entirely disingenuous.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
Again, you are going to have to discredit the whistle blower this time, he is not anonymous.

So keep trying to distract, your concern is entirely disingenuous.

It's called basic critical thinking. If a publication is verified to be consistently and maliciously dishonest, as Project Veritas is, you don't trust it.

Just as no one here trusts you.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
It's called basic critical thinking. If a publication is verified to be consistently and maliciously dishonest, as Project Veritas is, you don't trust it.

Just as no one here trusts you.

But we do enjoy laughing at his idiocy, so at least he has that! James O'Queef is a worthless shit who hasn't had to work a real job yet because he's supported by Wingnut Welfare. He slices and dices his videos to fit his narrative, which brings in the bottom-feeders like yourself to suck it up and shit it all over the place.

You link, we laugh.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Propaganda parrot, hard at work

205786-d72d71e028a7a2cfcf81763da8036fac.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and nickqt

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
Um, he works on language recognition for Google. That's it. That is the scope of his job. He has no part in policy or algorithms for Google despite his claims.

He's being oversold and his opinion held as "expert" when it is anything but. It is merely an alt-right opinion of someone who happens to work for Google OUTSIDE of any policy making portion of Google.

Nope. More Project Veritas Shens.

Note: The bulk of the video is intended to evoke an emotional response and sow distrust.

His portion is small, and is only claims. Backed up with no evidence whatsoever. Just him saying stuff.

Note this is exactly the stuff of every conspiracy theory video. And this video has just as much credibility as any conspiracy video.

Claims are not evidence.

The logic of the right-wing is wholly lacking any, and I mean any ability to determine what is, and is not credible and the difference between claims, and actual, factual objective evidence. They are, in point of fact, a conspiracy theory cult.
 
Last edited:

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Yet another never posts here other than when Trump is being beaten up Paid Entourage of Diverting Orange Sycophants shows up to divert with bullshit that was disproven before it was even shot. Run along comrade...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
I swear he's a professional troll.

Research into the techniques of the Russian propagandists discovered that an early step was to first plant stories on obscure forums. They would then use other media to then reference and amplify the content (often fake news/conspiracy theories) making it look like it was grassroots conversation. Hmm......

At the very least, Ooroooroo's habit of out-of-the-blue dump and runs contribute nothing to the forum. His absence wouldn't be missed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and Burpo

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
Again, you are going to have to discredit the whistle blower this time, he is not anonymous.

A standard applied equally, any outlet repeating the 1 in 5 lie, never mind the outlet which helped create it from inception should be disregarded by you if you weren't just applying double standards. But as we know, your only standard is the double standard.

So keep trying to distract, your concern is entirely disingenuous.

there is no standard here. you have no platform, neither does this O'Keefe felon.

fucking Russians. seriously: go fuck yourself, quisling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
In response to the Trump trolls rising from the muck today, due to their beloved leader shown to publicly commit multiple felonies, on his way to prison, I submit this in their honor, as they flail their pasta arms in a pathetic attempt to defend their desiccated fruit husk.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitek and dank69

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
It's called basic critical thinking. If a publication is verified to be consistently and maliciously dishonest, as Project Veritas is, you don't trust it.

Just as no one here trusts you.


You are not a credible arbiter of truth let alone have any claim on "critical thinking" after tens of thousands of articles on a russian conspiracy theory from your supposed "credible media" driving thousands of posts on here and it just blew up in your face yesterday as it inevitably would.
 
Last edited: