• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

CTSPD...is this ram bad?

alkemyst

No Lifer
ctspd Version : 0.9.2 / 9 Oct 2000
Date / time : 03/08/01 07:32:20 PM
Windows 95/98
Intel PIIX4 chipset detected
SDRAM 3
00 80 8 4 c 9 2 40 0 1 a0
10 60 0 80 8 0 1 8f 4 4 1
20 1 0 e a0 60 0 0 18 14 14
30 32 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 12 a8 7f 4a 0 0 0 0
70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
90 0 0 0 ff ff ff ff ff ff 0
100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
120 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 f4
Wrong contents at address 23 value : a0
Wrong contents at address 24 value : 60
Wrong contents at address 32 value : 0
Wrong contents at address 33 value : 0
Wrong contents at address 34 value : 0
Wrong contents at address 35 value : 0

I can put up screenshots if needed.
 
Back
Top