- Nov 16, 2004
- 1,499
- 0
- 0
Yeah, I think somebody later admitted that was like a Maya render or something similar.Originally posted by: pontifex
I think the original pic is BS. i think its either a real pic or its a FMV type render video, not in game.
Dude, seriously.Originally posted by: DannyLove
have you considered that maybe the demo is what it means... a demo?
Why speculate and assume on a demo release. WHy not just wait for the actual release before asking these questions???
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Wow I will still play Crysis but man does that disappoint.
Originally posted by: EvilComputer92
I think the original was clearly prerendered. Just shows you how stupid all those omg crysis comments from an year or two ago turned out to be.
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: EvilComputer92
I think the original was clearly prerendered. Just shows you how stupid all those omg crysis comments from an year or two ago turned out to be.
I have been bitching about this for so long. They pulled it with Oblivion, they pulled it with HL2, it keeps happening.
The difference is tremendous between those two pics.
It does disappoint, and the foliage does look shitty compared to the earlier previews. At the very least they ought to include that setting in the full version, allowing for hardware to keep up. Assuming it even exists anymore or ever did in the first place
Whining about sh!t on forums is the thing these days.Originally posted by: SexyK
I disagree with the OP and all the others jumping on the slam-Crysis bandwagon. The scenes being rendered in the "comparison" photos are completely different. It's like comparing apples and oranges. One has motion, smoke, and a low-hanging sun, while the other is completely static and has completely different foliage and a completely different lighting scenario. The comparison is useless and says nothing about the quality of the engine then and now.
Its also hilarious that half the threads complain that it looks too good and they should have designed for lower hardware requirements, and half the threads say it looks like crap and should be more "future proof" to take advantage of tomorrow's technology. Make up your minds people!
Personally, I think they game looks great and it plays well in my book considering what you're getting graphically. I will play it and enjoy it and not complain (unless its buggy or doesn't function correctly, in which case I will complain since we all waited so long for the game to come out).
Originally posted by: schneiderguy
This map that someone made for the demo looks just as good as the promo video from 1 year ago. Basically if you choose the correct lighting and time of day settings for a map it will look almost exactly like what they showed in the trailers a year ago.
Originally posted by: bamacre
http://hugeup.com/x/11042007/lolat1080p55.jpg
Let it load fully.
More...
http://pcgamingroom.com/shoote...creens-crysis-omg.html