Magic Carpet
Diamond Member
- Oct 2, 2011
- 3,477
- 231
- 106
You highlighted the problem very well in your post. People make up their minds from early reviews, sneak peeks. When the stuff gets actually optimized, nobody seems to notice that anymore, unless you are personally trying to keep up with that (sometimes it's the only sure-way of knowing).From my experience games that came out before Maxwell tend to show similar results to this. After Maxwell came out, Nvidia would prioritise game optimisation for Maxwell, leaving Kepler users 2 months behind for optimisations.
Of course most of the online game benchmark results would have been made before Kepler optimised drivers were available which I think is a bit unfair to Kepler. Especially when you see 780 results being on par with an AMD 280X when it previously competed with a 290. The timing of the 'drop' in results is highly suspicious.
Maxwell isn't worse than Kepler, but some of the pre-Maxwell games didn't get to see as much optimization as Kepler did back in the day. Quite possible, Crysis 3 was designed around those GPUs, when Maxwell existed only on paper.That's not to say that Maxwell isn't better than Kepler. I'm sure that it's optimisation has also improved like most cards do shortly after release.
Cheers. I don't like 290's but man, it has aged so well.
Last edited: