Cryptocoin Mining?

Page 70 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kly1222

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,102
0
0
Tried both 11.7 and 11.8.

No more dummy plugs and crashes from hardware accelerated video, ccc, gpu-z, 3d apps, etc fixed.

But I'm getting 100% cpu usage on my first core with affinity checked on miner. Forced me to go back to 11.6
 

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,240
2
76
hmph.

I would love to not have to pause my 6 series cards, but 100% on one core seems worse...

which miner you using?
 

kly1222

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,102
0
0
Latest python using guiminer.

I noticed some issues with afterburner 2.1 also on 11.7. OC and fan settings weren't always initializing right away on bootup. Had to manually apply it to get the settings to kick in.
 

WhoBeDaPlaya

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2000
7,414
401
126
What's the consensus on 11.5 vs 11.6/7 for mining?
My standardized Win7 images all have 11.5 for ATi cards and I'd like to try my hand at it when I'm not gaming using my 6970.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,668
997
136
I found a calculator that is suppose to predict your break even point which also adjusts for increased difficulty over time.

http://bitcoindetailedcalculator.appspot.com/

They way they seem to figure, in thirty days it will be pointless to bitmine. Is that realistic?

that's one of the better calculators i've seen. far more useful because it gives a good daily breakdown. the default numbers are a little off, but mining is highly dependent on location/equipment. I had to tweak the wattage value down to match my actual electricity costs($30/month). the default diff change value is set to last 3 month avg.(1.3) while the last 2 diff values have been around 1.1.
if you can find out your electricity costs from your bill, or know the avg of your region, you should be able to get an accurate estimate.

based on my values(0 system costs + $300 in video cards) and a diff change of 1.1, i wouldnt break even in 3 months if i started now. it also tells me that at 2months my returns reach a point where it isnt worth mining. luckily SI should be out by then.

a full 3card 5830 rig at 900Mhash will never break even ever, if it starts now. unless your electricity is free or btc jump over $30/coin, any mining scenario requires you to sell your cards to make any profit. and SI will massively cut that margin the closer it comes to release.
 
Last edited:

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
that's one of the better calculators i've seen. far more useful because it gives a good daily breakdown. the default numbers are a little off, but mining is highly dependent on location/equipment. I had to tweak the wattage value down to match my actual electricity costs($30/month). the default diff change value is set to last 3 month avg.(1.3) while the last 2 diff values have been around 1.1.
if you can find out your electricity costs from your bill, or know the avg of your region, you should be able to get an accurate estimate.

based on my values(0 system costs + $300 in video cards) and a diff change of 1.1, i wouldnt break even in 3 months if i started now. it also tells me that at 2months my returns reach a point where it isnt worth mining. luckily SI should be out by then.

a full 3card 5830 rig at 900Mhash will never break even ever, if it starts now. unless your electricity is free or btc jump over $30/coin, any mining scenario requires you to sell your cards to make any profit. and SI will massive cut that margin the closer it comes to release.

Do you think SI is going to be better for mining? Or, are you saying the reduced value of the VLIW4/5 cards after the release of SI will kill profitability? Sorry, I'm just trying to better understand your message.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Using 11.7 now, seems like a nice upgrade. No more need to plug swap or use dummy plugs, no real drawback. Not seeing the high CPU usage. Does that only affect 6 series cards or something? I've never seen it occur for me, CPU usage around 5-9% on each miner.
 

Mir96TA

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2002
1,949
37
91
Using 11.7 now, seems like a nice upgrade. No more need to plug swap or use dummy plugs, no real drawback. Not seeing the high CPU usage. Does that only affect 6 series cards or something? I've never seen it occur for me, CPU usage around 5-9% on each miner.

What GPU you have ? and How many ?
What minner software you are using ? (flags ?)
What version of older driver you had ?
What OS ?
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
What GPU you have ? and How many ?
What minner software you are using ? (flags ?)
What version of older driver you had ?
What OS ?

2X 5830 on this PC
guiminer (poclbm) -v -w128 -f128, or -f0 depending if I am using the computer
switched from 11.6 to 11.7
windows 7 enterprise 64 bit
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
0
Tried both 11.7 and 11.8.

No more dummy plugs and crashes from hardware accelerated video, ccc, gpu-z, 3d apps, etc fixed.

But I'm getting 100% cpu usage on my first core with affinity checked on miner. Forced me to go back to 11.6
This is fixed in 11.7?!

That's great to hear, last I heard it wasn't going to be fixed until the 11.8 release. That's nice if it's included in 11.7, though, the bug was driving me nuts.

Where can you download the pre-release drivers (like 11.8) anyway?

edit: Stupid question, just noticed the link on the previous page.
 
Last edited:

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,240
2
76
This is fixed in 11.7?!

That's great to hear, last I heard it wasn't going to be fixed until the 11.8 release. That's nice if it's included in 11.7, though, the bug was driving me nuts.

Where can you download the pre-release drivers (like 11.8) anyway?

edit: Stupid question, just noticed the link on the previous page.

:D
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,668
997
136
Do you think SI is going to be better for mining? Or, are you saying the reduced value of the VLIW4/5 cards after the release of SI will kill profitability? Sorry, I'm just trying to better understand your message.

yeah sorry, i had a feeling i wasnt going to be clear. (it is just a crap ton of variables that goes into this)

the upcoming SI cards can either:
A) perform worse in integer(hash) than hd 6 series [in which case cypress and cayman users get a reprieve and get to mine profitably for a few more month.]
B) perform equal to hd 6 series hash [but will likely be better performing electricity wise and might be more attractive as an upgrade]
C) perform better than 6 series hash. [making upgrading manditory]
But regardless of hash power, it will likely perform better in games than 6 series.

potential factors:
-amd refresh/reuse the vliw4 and the die shrink will up hashs just because they can stick more sp's in the die. [hashes +]
-amd goes gcn on 28 nm HP with some sort of vliw4 subcore [hashes +]
-amd goes gcn on 28 nm LP vliw4 and uses up die gains with redundancy traces [hashes =]
-amd goes gcn on 28 bulk and is generally neutral performing [hashes =]
-amd goes gcn and simd is disastrous for integer [hashes -]

any number of amd's options in designing SI can result in scenarios B or C but only an extreme worse case scenario will make A happen. But either case, more people will own cards with decent or optimal hash rates and it's guaranteed that some of them will mine.

Anything that increases number of miners or total compute power will increase difficulty which automatically kills profitability given the stagnant price of btc. As soon as difficulty increases go above 1.1 most miners will never hit a break even point unless you have really cheap electricity.

In that case you are required to sell your cards in order to eliminate your initial debt/investment and turn a profit on what you have mined. The less your cards are worth, the harder it is to turn a profit. And there are just too many things that will drive down the resale price. (new cards push down value of older cards, upgraders selling old cards to buy new cards flood the used markey, increased hash rate and lower power usage make old cards less attractive to miners, older cards unable to play newer games, etc.) While you might be able to find 1 chump on ebay willing to buy a 5830 at your original cost, can you find 7 chumps?

My critical point is that regardless of how SI performs in integer/hashes(and given the fermi example it is unlikely to be horrendous), the fact that it comes out will change the market which will affect everyone with a boatload of 5830's or even lesser performing 6 series cards to offload, and they need resale prices to be high in order to eliminate the red ink they accrued to build the miner rig. That's why there is a time factor or deadline to power mining.

As I have advised before, everyone who is power mining or considering it, needs to be running a spreadsheet with debts and actual power costs with a difficulty tracking value applied to btc return extrapolation. The calculator dougoman posted is a cheap shortcut if you cant figure out the maths.
 

Mir96TA

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2002
1,949
37
91
I have Ati Radeon 5850 1 GB ver with P45 Chipset and running on Win7 Pro 64 bit.
11.7 and .8 made no differnce in mining but cpu usage jumped to 40 %
I down graded to 11.6
BTW I did had a issue visual redistribution c++ and it was unable to install it
 
Last edited:

hawtdawg

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2005
1,223
7
81
I found a calculator that is suppose to predict your break even point which also adjusts for increased difficulty over time.

http://bitcoindetailedcalculator.appspot.com/

They way they seem to figure, in thirty days it will be pointless to bitmine. Is that realistic?

Thats figuring a 30% difficulty increase with each increase, which at this point seems really steep. Unless we see a mining surge, i think 10-15% difficulty increase is a more accurate guesstimate.

This next increase will also be affected by people who switched from namecoins to bitcoins after the latest namecoin difficulty increase (you could get bitcoins at twice the rate by mining namecoins and trading them there for a bit) and i still don't think it will even be 15%.
 

hawtdawg

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2005
1,223
7
81
Forgive me for being lazy, but can anyone tell me if the latest catalyst drivers fixed the issue with video hardlocking your system with 6xxx cards if you forgot to pause the miner?
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
0
Yeah it's fixed in 11.7. :)

Now if only they could fix the 100% CPU usage when mining with multiple GPUs. 11.8 pre-release didn't address this did it?
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
yeah sorry, i had a feeling i wasnt going to be clear. (it is just a crap ton of variables that goes into this)

the upcoming SI cards can either:
A) perform worse in integer(hash) than hd 6 series [in which case cypress and cayman users get a reprieve and get to mine profitably for a few more month.]
B) perform equal to hd 6 series hash [but will likely be better performing electricity wise and might be more attractive as an upgrade]
C) perform better than 6 series hash. [making upgrading manditory]
But regardless of hash power, it will likely perform better in games than 6 series.

I think you are looking at it in an overly simplistic way. For example, some people pay half as much as me for electricity. Some people pay 3X as much, some people legitimately get free electricity (condos with electricity included). Efficiency of the graphics card is really just one small piece of the puzzle. If you live in a condo with non-metered electricity, it doesn't really matter if SI is more efficient. If I pay half of what you pay, even if SI is 40% more efficient it's still going to cost me less for electricity to mine on my 5830.

If SI is great at mining, I agree that it will trigger some difficulty increases. But I think 5 series cards will remain profitable to some degree for most people, while those who pay the highest for electricity might get edged out.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,668
997
136
I think you are looking at it in an overly simplistic way. For example, some people pay half as much as me for electricity. Some people pay 3X as much, some people legitimately get free electricity (condos with electricity included). Efficiency of the graphics card is really just one small piece of the puzzle. If you live in a condo with non-metered electricity, it doesn't really matter if SI is more efficient. If I pay half of what you pay, even if SI is 40% more efficient it's still going to cost me less for electricity to mine on my 5830.

If SI is great at mining, I agree that it will trigger some difficulty increases. But I think 5 series cards will remain profitable to some degree for most people, while those who pay the highest for electricity might get edged out.

it doesnt matter how many miners have reduced electricity costs. the scenarios merely outline the range of SI probability and how each more or less drives upgrade or new purchase. If you run the calculator dougoman linked or make a spreadsheet, you will see diminishing returns due to difficulty increases(even at the mildest 1.1 - 1.15) still makes any older rig irrelevant in 4-6 months.

The numbers dont lie. You can argue about what is worth for some corner cases, but the majority of people wont make it to break even on $1000+ expenditures before the returns fall below a reasonable level. You need a massive upswing in btc value to make it worth mining.

Actually you would need SI to generate 700-900 mhash/s in order to sustain the kind of returns you are used to when difficulty hits the 3million range. We will probably cross the 2million line after 2 more rounds(3 at the most).

Run the calc, tell me when a 3 card system starting now crosses the break even point. Say a nominal 1 G/hash at $20 per month of electricity(tweak the wattage value and cost at .11$/kwhour) at 1.1 diff change over 12 months at a fixed $14 btc.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
If you run the calculator dougoman linked or make a spreadsheet, you will see diminishing returns due to difficulty increases(even at the mildest 1.1 - 1.15) still makes any older rig irrelevant in 4-6 months.

The numbers dont lie. You can argue about what is worth for some corner cases, but the majority of people wont make it to break even on $1000+ expenditures before the returns fall below a reasonable level. You need a massive upswing in btc value to make it worth mining.

5 series is more than 2 years old now and still profitable. Where do you get your 4-6 months figure?

Difficulty increase effect everyone and everything equally. It's all one big equation. If you double efficiency but you also double cost of electricity, your output doesn't change. Currently, mining is profitable for people with electricity cost 3X as high as mine. That is functionally equivalent to me having a 3X as efficient card, yet they are still in business. SI is simply another factor affecting profit just like difficulty and electricity cost, there is nothing special or significant about it unless it really is a huge (4X or more performance for same electricity) efficiency upgrade, which I doubt.

Besides all that, SI will not be priced at the same level as 5 series cards are available now. Even if an SI equivalent can do same MHASH as a 5830 for half the electricity, I bet you anything it'll cost a lot more than the $109 deals we had a month ago- probably more like $175 or $200.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,668
997
136
5 series is more than 2 years old now and still profitable. Where do you get your 4-6 months figure?

i'm being very generous with the electricity watts and cost here. this is for a new 3 card 5830 on a single m/b with a 800w psu and hd + os ~700$.

after 3 months you are down to half your btc rate, after six your are earning 1 coin in roughly a week.

Bitcoin Detailed Calculator Report ...

For these values ...

MHash : 1000.0
Difficulty : 1690906.2047244
Days : 365
Change : 1.1
Watt : 300.0
Electricity cost (USD/kwh) : 0.11
USD/BTC rate : 13.8575
Equipment / contract (USD): 700.0

You can expect ...


Day 1: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 0.595 BTC
Day 2: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 1.190 BTC
Day 3: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 1.784 BTC
Day 4: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 2.379 BTC
Day 5: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 2.974 BTC
Day 6: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 3.569 BTC
Day 7: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 4.164 BTC
Day 8: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 4.759 BTC
Day 9: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 5.353 BTC
Day 10: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 5.948 BTC
Day 11: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 6.543 BTC
Day 12: +0.595 BTC, Difficulty: 1.691M, 7.138 BTC
Day 13: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 7.718 BTC
Day 14: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 8.259 BTC
Day 15: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 8.799 BTC
Day 16: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 9.340 BTC
Day 17: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 9.881 BTC
Day 18: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 10.422 BTC
Day 19: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 10.962 BTC
Day 20: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 11.503 BTC
Day 21: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 12.044 BTC
Day 22: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 12.585 BTC
Day 23: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 13.125 BTC
Day 24: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 13.666 BTC
Day 25: +0.541 BTC, Difficulty: 1.860M, 14.207 BTC
Day 26: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 14.721 BTC
Day 27: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 15.212 BTC
Day 28: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 15.704 BTC
Day 29: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 16.196 BTC
Day 30: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 16.687 BTC
Day 31: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 17.179 BTC
Day 32: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 17.670 BTC
Day 33: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 18.162 BTC
Day 34: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 18.653 BTC
Day 35: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 19.145 BTC
Day 36: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 19.637 BTC
Day 37: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 20.128 BTC
Day 38: +0.492 BTC, Difficulty: 2.046M, 20.620 BTC
Day 39: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 21.075 BTC
Day 40: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 21.522 BTC
Day 41: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 21.969 BTC
Day 42: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 22.416 BTC
Day 43: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 22.863 BTC
Day 44: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 23.309 BTC
Day 45: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 23.756 BTC
Day 46: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 24.203 BTC
Day 47: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 24.650 BTC
Day 48: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 25.097 BTC
Day 49: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 25.544 BTC
Day 50: +0.447 BTC, Difficulty: 2.251M, 25.991 BTC
Day 51: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 26.434 BTC
Day 52: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 26.840 BTC
Day 53: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 27.247 BTC
Day 54: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 27.653 BTC
Day 55: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 28.059 BTC
Day 56: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 28.466 BTC
Day 57: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 28.872 BTC
Day 58: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 29.278 BTC
Day 59: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 29.684 BTC
Day 60: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 30.091 BTC
Day 61: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 30.497 BTC
Day 62: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 30.903 BTC
Day 63: +0.406 BTC, Difficulty: 2.476M, 31.309 BTC
Day 64: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 31.702 BTC
Day 65: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 32.072 BTC
Day 66: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 32.441 BTC
Day 67: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 32.811 BTC
Day 68: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 33.180 BTC
Day 69: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 33.549 BTC
Day 70: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 33.919 BTC
Day 71: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 34.288 BTC
Day 72: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 34.657 BTC
Day 73: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 35.027 BTC
Day 74: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 35.396 BTC
Day 75: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 35.765 BTC
Day 76: +0.369 BTC, Difficulty: 2.723M, 36.135 BTC
Day 77: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 36.483 BTC
Day 78: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 36.819 BTC
Day 79: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 37.154 BTC
Day 80: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 37.490 BTC
Day 81: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 37.826 BTC
Day 82: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 38.162 BTC
Day 83: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 38.497 BTC
Day 84: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 38.833 BTC
Day 85: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 39.169 BTC
Day 86: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 39.505 BTC
Day 87: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 39.840 BTC
Day 88: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 40.176 BTC
Day 89: +0.336 BTC, Difficulty: 2.996M, 40.512 BTC
Day 90: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 40.820 BTC
Day 91: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 41.125 BTC
Day 92: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 41.431 BTC
Day 93: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 41.736 BTC
Day 94: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 42.041 BTC
Day 95: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 42.346 BTC
Day 96: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 42.652 BTC
Day 97: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 42.957 BTC
Day 98: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 43.262 BTC
Day 99: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 43.567 BTC
Day 100: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 43.873 BTC
Day 101: +0.305 BTC, Difficulty: 3.295M, 44.178 BTC
Day 102: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 44.478 BTC
Day 103: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 44.756 BTC
Day 104: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 45.033 BTC
Day 105: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 45.311 BTC
Day 106: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 45.588 BTC
Day 107: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 45.866 BTC
Day 108: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 46.143 BTC
Day 109: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 46.421 BTC
Day 110: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 46.698 BTC
Day 111: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 46.976 BTC
Day 112: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 47.253 BTC
Day 113: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 47.531 BTC
Day 114: +0.277 BTC, Difficulty: 3.625M, 47.808 BTC
Day 115: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 48.075 BTC
Day 116: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 48.327 BTC
Day 117: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 48.579 BTC
Day 118: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 48.831 BTC
Day 119: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 49.084 BTC
Day 120: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 49.336 BTC
Day 121: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 49.588 BTC
Day 122: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 49.840 BTC
Day 123: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 50.093 BTC
Day 124: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 50.345 BTC
Day 125: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 50.597 BTC
Day 126: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 50.849 BTC
Day 127: +0.252 BTC, Difficulty: 3.987M, 51.102 BTC
Day 128: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 51.338 BTC
Day 129: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 51.567 BTC
Day 130: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 51.796 BTC
Day 131: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 52.026 BTC
Day 132: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 52.255 BTC
Day 133: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 52.484 BTC
Day 134: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 52.714 BTC
Day 135: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 52.943 BTC
Day 136: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 53.172 BTC
Day 137: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 53.402 BTC
Day 138: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 53.631 BTC
Day 139: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 53.860 BTC
Day 140: +0.229 BTC, Difficulty: 4.386M, 54.090 BTC
Day 141: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 54.298 BTC
Day 142: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 54.507 BTC
Day 143: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 54.715 BTC
Day 144: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 54.924 BTC
Day 145: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 55.132 BTC
Day 146: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 55.341 BTC
Day 147: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 55.549 BTC
Day 148: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 55.758 BTC
Day 149: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 55.966 BTC
Day 150: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 56.175 BTC
Day 151: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 56.383 BTC
Day 152: +0.208 BTC, Difficulty: 4.824M, 56.592 BTC
Day 153: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 56.795 BTC
Day 154: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 56.985 BTC
Day 155: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 57.174 BTC
Day 156: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 57.364 BTC
Day 157: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 57.554 BTC
Day 158: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 57.743 BTC
Day 159: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 57.933 BTC
Day 160: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 58.122 BTC
Day 161: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 58.312 BTC
Day 162: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 58.501 BTC
Day 163: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 58.691 BTC
Day 164: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 58.880 BTC
Day 165: +0.190 BTC, Difficulty: 5.307M, 59.070 BTC
Day 166: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 59.250 BTC
Day 167: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 59.423 BTC
Day 168: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 59.595 BTC
Day 169: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 59.767 BTC
Day 170: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 59.939 BTC
Day 171: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 60.112 BTC
Day 172: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 60.284 BTC
Day 173: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 60.456 BTC
Day 174: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 60.629 BTC
Day 175: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 60.801 BTC
Day 176: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 60.973 BTC
Day 177: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 61.146 BTC
Day 178: +0.172 BTC, Difficulty: 5.837M, 61.318 BTC
Day 179: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 61.478 BTC
Day 180: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 61.634 BTC
Day 181: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 61.791 BTC
Day 182: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 61.948 BTC
Day 183: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 62.104 BTC
Day 184: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 62.261 BTC
Day 185: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 62.418 BTC
Day 186: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 62.574 BTC
Day 187: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 62.731 BTC
Day 188: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 62.887 BTC
Day 189: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 63.044 BTC
Day 190: +0.157 BTC, Difficulty: 6.421M, 63.201 BTC
Day 191: +0.142 BTC, Difficulty: 7.063M, 63.356 BTC
Day 192: +0.142 BTC, Difficulty: 7.063M, 63.499 BTC
Day 193: +0.142 BTC, Difficulty: 7.063M, 63.641 BTC
Day 194: +0.142 BTC, Difficulty: 7.063M, 63.784 BTC
Day 195: +0.142 BTC, Difficulty: 7.063M, 63.926 BTC