Originally posted by: Rainsford
You know, for a group that "values human life", the Israelis sure do seem to be pretty good at ending it. I mean, they make it sound like they do everything they can to minimize civilian casualties, yet somehow they manage to kill a fairly large number of civilians. In fact, they seem to be better at doing it than actual terrorists they are fighting.
Come back to the discussion when you know what you are talking about re: the Middle East. Sounds like you bought right into that famous Arab propaganda.
Israel has a HUGE PR problem...that much is obvious, but have you pro-Israel folks ever wondered why that is? Maybe it's because Israel (and you guys) rant and rave about a fight to the death were only one side can survive, and equate it to WWII and all that...but instead of two powerful nations going toe to toe, everyone sees a first-world nation with a huge military and every possible modern weapon beating the ever living crap out of a bunch of third-world people. I'm not saying Israel isn't justified in defending itself, obviously they are, but it doesn't LOOK like they are fighting for their lives, it looks like they are just looking for every excuse to bomb someone. I mean, are they REALLY in life or death danger from people who fire rockets at them and moderately injure one person? I bet the last series of laser guided bombings did a lot more than that...
They're not 'beating the crap' out of anyone, dimwit. If they were, you'd see thousands of casualties. They are choosing their targets carefully, and minimizing civilian casualties. Not even you can refute the fact that indiscriminate killing by one side and calculated, precision killing of actually known killers by the other side are not equivalent.
Obviously terrorism against Israel is a problem that needs to be dealt with, but I can't help but wonder if Israel might have more popular support if they acted with more restraint sometimes.
They just did. They always do. Read the OP. Argument over.
Clearly any show of restraint enrages the pro-Israeli folks here for some reason, but it helps take a lot of power out of the propaganda of the other side.
Not true at all. I'm glad Israel did not fire on the civilians gathered there by their leaders, it just goes to show who's the real enemy here.
And make no mistake, that's the real danger here. You people arguing that Israel (or the West in general) is going to lose some traditional physical conflict with the terrorists are clearly living in some sort of alternate reality...
They won't, because of the simple fact that they have a strong military. And yet you and others like you bemoan this fact. You are using circular logic. Your argument is inherently weak.
but what COULD happen is that Israel loses the war of popular opinion, so THEY end up looking like the terrorists. And it won't (just) be the fault of Muslim propaganda, Israel has done a lot of work to dig themselves into this hole they current inhabit...
It's happening already, and through no fault of Israel. The UN has always been to the Arab nations like Bud Selig is to the Red Sox. They each give their respective parties every chance to succeed in spite of their most heated rivals. Just look at the number of 'resolutions' against Israel, and the number against nations like Lebanon, the Palestinian government, Iran, Iraq. I believe it far exceeds each one. Now think: what country is more dangerous to international security, Iran or Israel? Iraq pre-war or Israel? Hezbollah and Hamas (now legitimate government affiliates) or Israel? And you have your answer. Israel has always lived with the UN standing against it. And you wonder why there is no peace in that region for the entirety of Israel's existence. The UN does not take the necessary steps to prevent terrorism in nations where it is known to exist. Israel has had a history of NOT wanting their neighbors' land, evidenced by the fact that they gave back 90-plus percent of the land captured in the 1967 war. If they really wanted that land they could have given back much, much less. No, they trade land for peace, because they want peace. But they don't get peace, because their neighbors don't want peace. Simple.
