TheCorm
Here's the scoop...
Enlight 340W
+5v @ 30A
+12 @ 15A
+3.3 @ 28A
Swapped due to a low 3.3 reading after 3 months
CompUSA 500W PS and why I went with it over the Antec the first time. Remember that I was seeing a problem with the 3.3v while all others were fine. I figured the Enlight was weak or screwed up from the factory and the Comp PS with even more on the +3.3v side would be plenty.... as long as the current draw was not shared. However, that was never mentioned.
+5 @ 40A
+12 @ 16A
+3.3 @ 30A
Antec Truepower 430 - Current PS
+5 @ 36A
+12 @ 20A
+3.3 @ 28A
According to what I read about the Antec, the achillies heel may have been the 12v all along if their claim is correct that most PS's have one output (shared) that is stepped down to the target voltage rails of +3.3, +5, +12, etc. As I understand now, if the demand on the +12v rail becomes too great the lowest rail would starve, misleading me to belive the 3.3v rail from the PS had failed again.
Antec claims to have dedicated outputs for each lead. Makes perfect sense to me but I was surprised to learn that this is somewhat rare for power supplies.
I could be wrong but at $200 in PS's so far, I hope I have a better understanding of this lesson I've learned. Numbers are almost worthless; more marketing hype than anything. I still have the Comp PS and I can RMA it and wait weeks for the swap, but why? If the design is as Antec states then why on earth would I want another one? Not a chance.
I learn something new every day with these D$&@ things.
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
R