• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Crossbar RRAM: Step Aside, NAND!

Aikouka

Lifer
I stumbled across an article earlier today about a new non-volatile memory called Crossbar RRAM. The gist is that the technology is supposed to offer (20x) faster writes with (10x) better endurance at a smaller footprint. The best part is that they already have working silicon. I think I was going to lose it if I read one more article about a promising battery tech that we'll never see. 😛

Here's the article:

Move over, NAND flash memory. Santa Clara-based startup Crossbar, Inc. has developed a non-volatile memory technology based on resistive random-access memory. Dubbed Crossbar RRAM, the tech promises 20X the write performance of NAND flash memory with 10X the endurance. RRAM isn't just a distant speck on the horizon, either. According to the Crossbar press release, a working test chip has already been produced. Company CEO George Minassian says Crossbar RRAM is "easy to manufacture and ready for commercialization," as well.

The Crossbar tech is based on RRAM patents licensed exclusively from the University of Michigan. Each cell sandwiches an insulating switching medium between electrode layers. Applying a voltage to those electrodes causes nanoparticles in the switching medium to form a conductive filament between them. The simple cell structure is amenable to stacking, according to Crossbar, and it can be scaled down to fabrication nodes smaller than five nanometers.

NAND endurance tends to diminish at smaller cell geometries, but longevity shouldn't be a problem for Crossbar RRAM. There's no need to erase the contents of cells before reprogramming them, which should cut down on write/erase cycles. The cells themselves are quite robust, too. Crossbar claims they can withstand one million write cycles. That figure likely refers to single-bit applications, but RRAM also supports MLC configurations with multiple bits per cell. The memory type's claimed 20-year data retention looks pretty solid, too.

Crossbar touts RRAM's easy integration with SoC circuitry, and the firm seems intent on providing on-chip storage for smartphone and tablet processors. Its first product will be an embedded SoC. SSDs—and particularly enterprise-oriented drives—are also mentioned as potential applications.

RRAM's prodigious storage potential makes it particularly appealing for PC applications. Crossbar says the technology can squeeze up to a terabyte onto a single, 200-mm² chip, though it doesn't detail the number of layers or the fabrication process required to achieve that feat. For the 25-nm chip pictured above, which is presumably a single-layer implementation, Crossbar RRAM more than doubles the storage density of NAND flash.

Flash memory is big business these days, but its limited write endurance presents a very real challenge to scaling down to smaller process geometry. RRAM looks like an attractive alternative, especially if SoC integration is as easy as advertised. We'll have to see how long it takes Crossbar to get RRAM products on the market—and how much they cost per gigabyte, of course. If you're curious about Crossbar RRAM, you can read more about it in this whitepaper (PDF).
 
The best part is that they already have working silicon. I think I was going to lose it if I read one more article about a promising battery tech that we'll never see. 😛


...then, you'll ought not read the article about crossbar batteries.
 
Heh, stumbled on the same article and came here to post about it.

The numbers they quote (20X faster, 3 orders more durable, 20 year retention) are just absolutely absurd improvements.

Too good to be true, I'm sure, but it will be nice if we really get to have something with the trifecta of speed, durability, and density.

The 20 year retention number they casually throw around is better than you'd get with most HDDs...

Could be good stuff if they can get it manufactured with a reasonable cost (which is by no means guaranteed)
 
<insert company name> has developed a new <insert product type> that is <insert number of times its faster than current product> and will be out in <insert date... no wait dont!>
 
Wikipedia's article on the subject links to a Panasonic evaluation kit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistive_random-access_memory

"Panasonic has launched a ReRAM evaluation kit in May 2012 based on a tantalum oxide 1T1R (1 transistor - 1 resistor) memory cell architecture."

http://translate.google.com/transla...cial.data/data.dir/jn120515-1/jn120515-1.html

IIUC, the ReRAM is built into the microcontroller chip rather than being in the form of a discrete memory chip.

BTW, Crossbar's whitepaper states that ...

"Scaling NAND technology adversely impacts the retention and cycling characteristics of Flash NAND and the storage system. For example, scaling from 72nm to 20nm has shown an increase of the raw bit error rate (BER) from 1e-7 to 1e-2, and a decrease of cycling from 10,000 cycles to below 3,000 cycles."

1 error per 100 bits (1e-2) is scary.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top