Originally posted by: Homerboy
60ms is what I was going for (and argued with). Thanks for backing me up![]()
Originally posted by: Homerboy
Shorter of course. It was a customer. Don't get me started.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Homerboy
Shorter of course. It was a customer. Don't get me started.
Heh, well if they're on a T1 or less (or IMA) serialization delay is going to play a decent chunk. I always laugh at "well it shouldn't matter how far!" Yes it does, a lot.
Originally posted by: mxnerd
Just tested.
California to Connecticut 90-95ms, California to New York 45ms
That's a huge difference considering they are next to each other.
Originally posted by: Homerboy
1 single congested router will add that 45ms. Not a good thing, but it can and will happen.
