Originally posted by: SP33Demon
My kids said awesome!
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
The problem with this board is I think we all follow the news too closely. Sure this is a big problem, sure there will be a large and painful bill to pay for all this someday. The problem is that people see events and blow them way out of proportion. We have a very large problem with this credit meltdown, but to have people see it and declare '2ndgreatdepressionhyperinflation1930sGermanyohmygodMadMaxfuture!' isn't really reasonable until a lot more bad stuff happens.
Same thing happens with the election.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Terrible analogy - the reality is 700B now or x times more for public works programs, output lost etc. Deficit spending is bad because of the inflation, but that's not really a problem deflationary climate (read: credit crisis).
So in terms of the nominal amount of debt, it would be an increase or a bigger increase. Not a good thing, but it's one or the other. As far as our peers go, U.S. is still not doing that bad, despite electing a group of idiots twice...
*snipped*
I read yesterday that Dubai's debt is spiralling like crazy, it's now over 100% of its GDP and rising very quickly.Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Terrible analogy - the reality is 700B now or x times more for public works programs, output lost etc. Deficit spending is bad because of the inflation, but that's not really a problem deflationary climate (read: credit crisis).
So in terms of the nominal amount of debt, it would be an increase or a bigger increase. Not a good thing, but it's one or the other. As far as our peers go, U.S. is still not doing that bad, despite electing a group of idiots twice...
Debt as a % of GDP:
Germany 64.90
United States 60.80
France 63.90
Canada 64.20
Italy 104.0
Japan 170.00
United Kingdom 43.60
Russia 5.90
Note the pattern that the most industrialized nations have a fair bit of debt? Think finance - how does your return on equity change with or without leverage?
Originally posted by: JS80
HYPERINFLATION HYPERINFLATION RAWWWWAAAAR
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Terrible analogy - the reality is 700B now or x times more for public works programs, output lost etc. Deficit spending is bad because of the inflation, but that's not really a problem deflationary climate (read: credit crisis).
So in terms of the nominal amount of debt, it would be an increase or a bigger increase. Not a good thing, but it's one or the other. As far as our peers go, U.S. is still not doing that bad, despite electing a group of idiots twice...
*snipped*
Not doing too bad?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi92.html
I don't want to say it, but if you can temporarily suspend your disbelief over the fantasy nature of certain parts of our economy you have to admit that it's served the country pretty damn well. If it is a house of cards, perhaps we can keep it up. Yes, the US has more wealth than it should by many accounts, but after decades and decades, if the jig is still not up, should we really mess with it severely?Originally posted by: bamacre
The real irony of the OP is that it is the very system that Ron Paul so adamantly opposes that created this problem in the first place.
So we pass a $700 billion bailout, and libor is down. Big fucking deal. At what cost? Massive increase in debt. Socialization of the banking industry. Need I go on?
Originally posted by: bamacre
The real irony of the OP is that it is the very system that Ron Paul so adamantly opposes that created this problem in the first place.
So we pass a $700 billion bailout, and libor is down. Big fucking deal. At what cost? Massive increase in debt. Socialization of the banking industry. Need I go on?
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Terrible analogy - the reality is 700B now or x times more for public works programs, output lost etc. Deficit spending is bad because of the inflation, but that's not really a problem deflationary climate (read: credit crisis).
So in terms of the nominal amount of debt, it would be an increase or a bigger increase. Not a good thing, but it's one or the other. As far as our peers go, U.S. is still not doing that bad, despite electing a group of idiots twice...
Debt as a % of GDP:
Germany 64.90
United States 60.80
France 63.90
Canada 64.20
Italy 104.0
Japan 170.00
United Kingdom 43.60
Russia 5.90
Note the pattern that the most industrialized nations have a fair bit of debt? Think finance - how does your return on equity change with or without leverage?
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Terrible analogy - the reality is 700B now or x times more for public works programs, output lost etc. Deficit spending is bad because of the inflation, but that's not really a problem deflationary climate (read: credit crisis).
So in terms of the nominal amount of debt, it would be an increase or a bigger increase. Not a good thing, but it's one or the other. As far as our peers go, U.S. is still not doing that bad, despite electing a group of idiots twice...
*snipped*
Not doing too bad?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi92.html
You linked to a guy that writes articles about natural health and has a ron paul pitch in the last paragraph. GTFOH
No one is arguing that endless spending is good; but misguided libertopians simply have no clue when it comes to macro policy. If you can ignore inflation (given the current climate), the debt can grow at the rate of GDP growth and we'll still be comfortably between the G8 countries.
It's kind of like guy that makes 100K / year with 20K debt is about as risky as guy that makes 200K / year with 40K debt, ceteris paribus. Also why the debt clock is kind of stupid, because the nominal amount of debt doesn't tell you anything. (ie I'm 30K in debt... is that bad, good, ok if you know nothing else about me?)
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: BigDH01
All it took was a few trillion dollars in injections and guarantees. This isn't over yet.
Exactly. All bills come due eventually.
We ran out of cash, applied for a new credit card, and maxed it out. Problem solved as far as I am concerned.
Terrible analogy - the reality is 700B now or x times more for public works programs, output lost etc. Deficit spending is bad because of the inflation, but that's not really a problem deflationary climate (read: credit crisis).
So in terms of the nominal amount of debt, it would be an increase or a bigger increase. Not a good thing, but it's one or the other. As far as our peers go, U.S. is still not doing that bad, despite electing a group of idiots twice...
*snipped*
Not doing too bad?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi92.html
You linked to a guy that writes articles about natural health and has a ron paul pitch in the last paragraph. GTFOH
No one is arguing that endless spending is good; but misguided libertopians simply have no clue when it comes to macro policy. If you can ignore inflation (given the current climate), the debt can grow at the rate of GDP growth and we'll still be comfortably between the G8 countries.
It's kind of like guy that makes 100K / year with 20K debt is about as risky as guy that makes 200K / year with 40K debt, ceteris paribus. Also why the debt clock is kind of stupid, because the nominal amount of debt doesn't tell you anything. (ie I'm 30K in debt... is that bad, good, ok if you know nothing else about me?)