I just bought a Creative Labs CD-Rom Blaster 52X, model mk4108. I got it so I could make quick CD to CD copies with my Plexwriter 12-10-32A drive. My software is Easy CD Platinum 5.01 and Plextor Manager 2000. Computer is Dell Optiplex GX1P, 450 MHZ Pentium, 128 MB memory.
Creative labs says their drive does Digital Audio Extraction at up to 20X; the system tests in EasyCD say it can only reliably do 9X. Both Easycd and Plextor Manager will only copy audio CDs at 8X.
That is a little slow, but I can live with it. Much more annoying is that EasyCD says the Blaster can only read data reliably at 5X; hence a data disk can only be copied at around 4X.
I realize listed CD-Rom speeds are unrealistically high in practice, but being off by a factor of 10 is a bit much. Further, the 3 year old 32X drive that used to be in there could read data at around 18X (but could only do DAE at around 4X). With that drive, I could copy data disks at 12X without any problem.
I've tried it with DMA turned on and then off, and I've used a variety of disks for testing. And, as I said, older and supposedly slower drives actually work faster.
Is this normal behavior??? I've never seen a cd rom that was slower at reading data than it was at DAE. I passed up cheaper drives because of the Creative name, but maybe that was a mistake. Any suggestions are appreciated. RW
Creative labs says their drive does Digital Audio Extraction at up to 20X; the system tests in EasyCD say it can only reliably do 9X. Both Easycd and Plextor Manager will only copy audio CDs at 8X.
That is a little slow, but I can live with it. Much more annoying is that EasyCD says the Blaster can only read data reliably at 5X; hence a data disk can only be copied at around 4X.
I realize listed CD-Rom speeds are unrealistically high in practice, but being off by a factor of 10 is a bit much. Further, the 3 year old 32X drive that used to be in there could read data at around 18X (but could only do DAE at around 4X). With that drive, I could copy data disks at 12X without any problem.
I've tried it with DMA turned on and then off, and I've used a variety of disks for testing. And, as I said, older and supposedly slower drives actually work faster.
Is this normal behavior??? I've never seen a cd rom that was slower at reading data than it was at DAE. I passed up cheaper drives because of the Creative name, but maybe that was a mistake. Any suggestions are appreciated. RW
