Creationist offers $10K to prove Bible wrong

Skel

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,223
680
136
Sorry if repost, I did search..

While I personally couldn't care less about what people believe, but I keep seeing a ton of threads where a ton of people keep saying that Creationism is proven wrong, so a challenge like this should be a cake walk.

Basically some guy is putting up $10K on a bet that you can't prove the Bible isn't fact.

http://living.msn.com/life-inspired...ost?post=56fddca5-e512-4367-b2bb-7530e3bc8006

The details...
http://creationsciencehalloffame.org/contests/literal-genesis-trial-contest/
 

Chrono

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2001
4,959
0
71
Should be the reverse. Someone should offer some money for creationist to prove it is fact.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,165
10,625
126
Bullshit circus show. No science is fact. It's generally accepted as true with the provision that future evidence may modify it. This is a con game, and someone of his stature shouldn't be engaging in such behavior.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
I offer a million to those that can prove a negative.

i can prove a negative. i can prove you weren't hanging out with gary busey on tuesday night by asking gary busey if you were hanging out with him. he'll answer no. negative proven. :colbert:
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,902
4,927
136
In B4 "creationism can't be real because Evolution is fact". Please. Evolution is just a theory.

Just like gravity.
 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
In B4 "creationism can't be real because Evolution is fact". Please. Evolution is just a theory.

Just like gravity.

Jesus Christ on a pogo stick with a walking stick up his ass!!!!

Prove gravity wrong then. Gravity is a proven theoretical scentific fact, unless facts come along that change said theory.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,165
10,625
126
Jesus Christ on a pogo stick with a walking stick up his ass!!!!

Prove gravity wrong then. Gravity is a proven theoretical scentific fact, unless facts come along that change said theory.

You been had son!

:^D
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,991
3,348
146
"Mastropaolo's bio indicates he has already scientifically proved that Adam and Eve were genetically perfect, that "ape-men are frauds" and that the Earth is 6,800 years old, give or take eight and a half centuries. "

hmmm
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
i can prove a negative. i can prove you weren't hanging out with gary busey on tuesday night by asking gary busey if you were hanging out with him. he'll answer no. negative proven. :colbert:

Gary Busey might not know where he was on Tuesday.
 

Chrono

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2001
4,959
0
71
So question is... why do creationist not question the authority that is telling them not to think otherwise? I mean... not even a lil bit of doubt? Like seriously... not even question the people behind the church and their motives?
 
Last edited:
Apr 12, 2010
10,510
10
0
Someone writes a book because they heard voices.
I kill someone because the voices told me to do it.
Why don't I get the praise?
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
So question is... why do creationist not question the authority that is telling them not to think otherwise? I mean... not even a lil bit of doubt? Like seriously... not even question the people behind the church and their motives?

The type of person who believes in creationism isn't the same type of person that can think critically. Trying to explain science to a creationist is the equivalent of trying to get someone to smell a flower with their ear - it just isn't happening.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
I'm offering a billion dollars and a blowjob from the Playboy playmate of their choice to anyone who can prove the Flying Spaghetti Monster isn't real.

$10K is a joke, dude doesn't sound very confident.
 

CountZero

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2001
1,796
36
86
It isn't the whole bible just literal genesis vs non-literal genesis. Depending on how narrow a view is taken on literal genesis (the book of Genesis or just the beginning of all things or the beginning of man) disproving it could be very difficult. I mean big bang vs omnipotent being is going to be pretty hard but book of Genesis should be somewhat easier. Though proving beyond a shadow of a doubt a negative is always going to be hard and it wouldn't take much to introduce doubt even with it being pseudo science.