I was bored today, so I made a massive spread sheet to determine how crackrack investment scales with output.  Of course it also shows which processor/mobo to get as well.  
The necessary assumptions include:
Best current processor price.
Most economic motherboard capable of desired o/c
(ie. it is not cost effective to use k7v to get 3% extra fsb)
The builder is willing to hard mod the AMD lineup
(ie. goldfingers not included)
Stock cooling.
(this resulted in assumptions such as c366@83, not 100)
Stock voltage.
(heavy hitter o/c boards have too large a price premium)
**for example you get more work units/$spent with a 366@83 on an lx than a 366@100 on a be6-2**
Does not take into account 'ultra-sweet' deals which may not be here tomorrow. ($49 P3B-F @ Just Deals comes to mind.)
Extraneous node components (PS/NIC/RAM) lump valued @ $100 for lack of a better number.
There are others...I forgot them at the moment.
Anyway, everybody can predict the winner, I am sure.
Duron 600. That's with a Biostar @ $105.
The top 5:
#1 Duron 600 @ 850 on the Biostar
#2 Duron 650 @ 850 on the Biostar
#3 Celeron 600 @ 900 on via (Celeron/P3 mobo valued at $60)
#4 Duron 700 @ 850 on the Biostar
#5 Celeron 566 @ 850
Two things about that list,
first, mobo's for celerons can be had cheaper
second, I am not comfortable saying they will achieve 100fsb stock on a cheap mobo with stock cooling...I never said this would be accurate!
 
This is in Mkeys/s
$spent-->$500 $1000 $1500 $2000
#1. 5.743 11.486 17.230 22.973 (#1 = duron above)
#2. 5.370 10.740 16.110 21.480 (etc)
#3. 5.216 10.432 15.648 20.864
#4. 5.025 10.051 15.076 20.101
#5. 5.003 10.005 15.008 20.010
Oh, one flaw, to get that 22.973 you must buy 7.722 units.
I did this on about 50 processors.
Here are some data at the $1000 investment point.
Athlon 550@700(SD11) 8.957
Athlon 650@800(SD11) 9.929
Tbird 800@900(Biostar) 8.355
466a@529(lx) 7.163
500e@750(via) 7.473
700e@868(via) 7.212
And so on...tired of typing.
So, in short, what we already knew, more crack from Durons.
I said I was bored today.
			
			The necessary assumptions include:
Best current processor price.
Most economic motherboard capable of desired o/c
(ie. it is not cost effective to use k7v to get 3% extra fsb)
The builder is willing to hard mod the AMD lineup
(ie. goldfingers not included)
Stock cooling.
(this resulted in assumptions such as c366@83, not 100)
Stock voltage.
(heavy hitter o/c boards have too large a price premium)
**for example you get more work units/$spent with a 366@83 on an lx than a 366@100 on a be6-2**
Does not take into account 'ultra-sweet' deals which may not be here tomorrow. ($49 P3B-F @ Just Deals comes to mind.)
Extraneous node components (PS/NIC/RAM) lump valued @ $100 for lack of a better number.
There are others...I forgot them at the moment.
Anyway, everybody can predict the winner, I am sure.
Duron 600. That's with a Biostar @ $105.
The top 5:
#1 Duron 600 @ 850 on the Biostar
#2 Duron 650 @ 850 on the Biostar
#3 Celeron 600 @ 900 on via (Celeron/P3 mobo valued at $60)
#4 Duron 700 @ 850 on the Biostar
#5 Celeron 566 @ 850
Two things about that list,
first, mobo's for celerons can be had cheaper
second, I am not comfortable saying they will achieve 100fsb stock on a cheap mobo with stock cooling...I never said this would be accurate!
This is in Mkeys/s
$spent-->$500 $1000 $1500 $2000
#1. 5.743 11.486 17.230 22.973 (#1 = duron above)
#2. 5.370 10.740 16.110 21.480 (etc)
#3. 5.216 10.432 15.648 20.864
#4. 5.025 10.051 15.076 20.101
#5. 5.003 10.005 15.008 20.010
Oh, one flaw, to get that 22.973 you must buy 7.722 units.
I did this on about 50 processors.
Here are some data at the $1000 investment point.
Athlon 550@700(SD11) 8.957
Athlon 650@800(SD11) 9.929
Tbird 800@900(Biostar) 8.355
466a@529(lx) 7.163
500e@750(via) 7.473
700e@868(via) 7.212
And so on...tired of typing.
So, in short, what we already knew, more crack from Durons.
I said I was bored today.
				
		
			