- Mar 30, 2001
- 16,642
- 62
- 91
Originally posted by: unclebabar
OMG!!! Now if we can only get you to trisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge.
Usually a writing utensil helps....Originally posted by: Alphathree33
How would you even bisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge?Originally posted by: unclebabar
OMG!!! Now if we can only get you to trisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge.
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
hehe thats right, impossible, at least according to microsoft...
Im running windows XP Pro on 32mb of ramabeit very slowly...
PICS!!!!!
Originally posted by: Alphathree33
Originally posted by: unclebabar
OMG!!! Now if we can only get you to trisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge.
How would you even bisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge?
Originally posted by: Alphathree33
Originally posted by: unclebabar
OMG!!! Now if we can only get you to trisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge.
How would you even bisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge?
Originally posted by: SWirth86
Usually a writing utensil helps....Originally posted by: Alphathree33How would you even bisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge?Originally posted by: unclebabar OMG!!! Now if we can only get you to trisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge.
Originally posted by: fatbaby
read my fricken post!
Originally posted by: Alphathree33
Originally posted by: SWirth86
Usually a writing utensil helps....Originally posted by: Alphathree33How would you even bisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge?Originally posted by: unclebabar OMG!!! Now if we can only get you to trisect an angle with only a compass and a straight edge.
Still, you need a way to measure midpoints in order to bisect an angle.
Commonly what I would do is measure and mark the same distance on both arms of the angle (points A and B) and then draw a line AB. If the vertex of the original angle is C, then M, the midpoint of AB, bisects angle ACB. (Since ABC is isoceles)
But I can't think of a good way to do this with only a straight and a compass (and a pencil, implied). Can you?
Just repeat it until there are 12 sections.....then 4 sections equal one thirdOriginally posted by: Alphathree33
Ohhhhhhh....
Well, hey, you learn something new every day.
No, I never learned that.
Now you've given me something interesting to do: write a proof that that actually does bisect the angle.
So I'd imagine the difficulty with trisecting comes from the fact that if you are to repeat this process you could divide the angle into quarters or eights but not thirds? Is that correct?
Originally posted by: jjsole
alert: this thread has been hijacked. please proceed to the nearest exits one by one, quietly and peacefully, and no one will get hurt.![]()
Originally posted by: SWirth86
Just repeat it until there are 12 sections.....then 4 sections equal one thirdOriginally posted by: Alphathree33 Ohhhhhhh.... Well, hey, you learn something new every day. No, I never learned that.Now you've given me something interesting to do: write a proof that that actually does bisect the angle.
So I'd imagine the difficulty with trisecting comes from the fact that if you are to repeat this process you could divide the angle into quarters or eights but not thirds? Is that correct?
Of course, It would look really ugly, and take a while, but it works
![]()
You are correct. I am stupid.Originally posted by: Alphathree33
12 is not a power of 2 last time I checked.Originally posted by: SWirth86
Just repeat it until there are 12 sections.....then 4 sections equal one thirdOriginally posted by: Alphathree33 Ohhhhhhh.... Well, hey, you learn something new every day. No, I never learned that.Now you've given me something interesting to do: write a proof that that actually does bisect the angle.
So I'd imagine the difficulty with trisecting comes from the fact that if you are to repeat this process you could divide the angle into quarters or eights but not thirds? Is that correct?
Of course, It would look really ugly, and take a while, but it works
![]()