CPUZ 1.73 Benchmark Thread

[superstition]

It's probably pretty INT heavy.

Crazy to see an anti-Cinebench benchmark.

It was funny that, way back when Intel led in integer and trailed in FP, everyone said integer was more important. Now that it's the opposite situation, suddenly FP-centric benching is the standard.

 

[Dresdenboy]

Crazy to see an anti-Cinebench benchmark.

It was funny that, way back when Intel led in integer and trailed in FP, everyone said integer was more important. Now that it's the opposite situation, suddenly FP-centric benching is the standard.

World isn't that simple. 😉
It's both int division and fp heavy.

 

[Aquamar1ne]

I'm somehow impressed

 

[DrMrLordX]

Wrong thread, there's a new one for 1.74:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2451682

 

[superstition]

It's both int division and fp heavy.

So it's a neutral benchmark unlike Cinebench?

 

[warzeta]

.


Here is mine 1250 single and 10750 multicore

 

[Maestro1337]

Why the fuck is my MT score with such low ratio???The single looks about fine.

 

[Arachnotronic]

Why the [fudge] is my MT score with such low ratio???The single looks about fine.

Maybe you have two broken cores? Seriously, go run a few other MT benchmarks and see if scaling is just as bad or if CPU-Z benchmark is an anomaly.

 

[Maestro1337]

Maybe you have two broken cores? Seriously, go run a few other MT benchmarks and see if scaling is just as bad or if CPU-Z benchmark is an anomaly.

nah brah, only happens here with this bench.

I srs think the MT of this bench is kinda broke.

 

[Arachnotronic]

nah brah, only happens here with this bench.

I srs think the MT of this bench is kinda broke.

yeah as long as your CPU performs as intended elsewhere, whatevs 😛

 

[Iching]

Image won't show up.

 

[Giorgosgr]

3930k@ 5.2Ghz Single: 1966 Multi: 12732