CPU-Z validation rejection?

[ghost recon88]

For some reason my Q9550 keeps getting validation rejections no matter what clock speed I have it set to. Anyone had any ideas if this is a bug with quads? I can validate my E8400 just fine.

4292MHz
4250MHz
4207MHz

 

[Idontcare]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=517765

I'm getting validation. Maybe try again?

For anyone else wanting to try with the latest cpuz - download cpuz 1.50 here

 

[ghost recon88]

Yea my E8400/P5Q combo validates just fine. I've tried it @ 495, 500, and 505FSB and still get the same error. I'm gonna try loading XP on it later today and see if that makes a difference.

 

[Idontcare]

What officially qualifies for rejection by CPU-Z validation algorithms? Invalid checksum or some such?

 

[aigomorla]

Originally posted by: Idontcare
What officially qualifies for rejection by CPU-Z validation algorithms? Invalid checksum or some such?

invalid checksums

usually really piss poor overclocking, not anywhere close to stable.

 

[ghost recon88]

Originally posted by: aigomorla

Originally posted by: Idontcare
What officially qualifies for rejection by CPU-Z validation algorithms? Invalid checksum or some such?

invalid checksums

usually really piss poor overclocking, not anywhere close to stable.

CPU-Z validations are for suicide shots, hence the whole "piss poor overclocking" :roll:

 

[Idontcare]

Originally posted by: aigomorla

Originally posted by: Idontcare
What officially qualifies for rejection by CPU-Z validation algorithms? Invalid checksum or some such?

invalid checksums

usually really piss poor overclocking, not anywhere close to stable.

Intriguing. I wonder how bad an overclock has to be in order for it to not be capable of generating a proper checksum. Must truly be on the verge of BSOD if the cpu utilization exceeds 3%.

 

[ghost recon88]

I can run Super Pi at those speeds, and I'm pretty sure that takes more then 3% CPU usage. Even stock speeds give me the invalidation.

 

[Rhoxed]

1.49 worked for me last week on my 940BE but not my 9850BE, now on 1.5 its reversed... lol 940BE wont validate and 9850BE is fine....

 

[Idontcare]

So its cpuz validator that is being all wonky then?

I've never used cpuz validator, this is all new to me.

 

[judasmachine]

I got rejected using 1.45, but updated to 1.5 and it went through.

 

[blackpanther26]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=499387

I got valitdated.

Even though it was unstable

 

[ghost recon88]

Originally posted by: blackpanther26
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=499387

I got valitdated.

Even though it was unstable

I finally got my validated today, turns out the issue was with Vista. XP did it just fine. I got the WR for Q9550 on air, and 2nd highest clocking Q9550 overall.

Linky

 

[dguy6789]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=518721

Works fine for me in Vista.

 

[blackpanther26]

Originally posted by: ghost recon88

Originally posted by: blackpanther26
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=499387

I got valitdated.

Even though it was unstable

I finally got my validated today, turns out the issue was with Vista. XP did it just fine. I got the WR for Q9550 on air, and 2nd highest clocking Q9550 overall.

Linky

image what you could do with the Q9650.

 

[Idontcare]

Originally posted by: ghost recon88

Originally posted by: blackpanther26
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=499387

I got valitdated.

Even though it was unstable

I finally got my validated today, turns out the issue was with Vista. XP did it just fine. I got the WR for Q9550 on air, and 2nd highest clocking Q9550 overall.

Linky

Cool :thumbsup:

Why does it not show your vcore?

 

[Rhoxed]

no validation does =]

 

[Idontcare]

Originally posted by: Rhoxed
no validation does =]

That's odd, why would they go to all the trouble of building a program that can monitor Vcc and build a database to capture people's uploaded cpuz screenshots but not take advantage of capturing the Vcore data which is meaningful info to practically everyone?