- Mar 27, 2009
- 12,968
- 221
- 106
5760 x 1080 (triple 1080p in Landscape) or 3240 x 1920 (triple 1080p in Portrait) has approximately 50% more resolution than a single 2560x1600 monitor yet it can be had for less than the half the price.
Does anyone have any links to a website that has done high resolution cpu scaling tests? I think this type of monitor arrangement could become more commonplace for multi-taskers and gamers. However, at the same time I wonder if 1 GB VRAM and/or memory bandwidth is holding back the CPU.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhAqTecVXbE
This man did some very nice testing with a 4.72 Ghz Core i7 at various resolutions. But so far no CPU scaling tests with the triple 2048 x1152 monitors.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=793
At this review site we also have some nice testing on single and triple 30" LCDs (but nothing with CPU scaling yet)
Does anyone have any links to a website that has done high resolution cpu scaling tests? I think this type of monitor arrangement could become more commonplace for multi-taskers and gamers. However, at the same time I wonder if 1 GB VRAM and/or memory bandwidth is holding back the CPU.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhAqTecVXbE
This man did some very nice testing with a 4.72 Ghz Core i7 at various resolutions. But so far no CPU scaling tests with the triple 2048 x1152 monitors.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=793
At this review site we also have some nice testing on single and triple 30" LCDs (but nothing with CPU scaling yet)
Last edited: