Hi, all:
My box is a KT7 - RAID, Athlon 1 Ghz, 384 megs RAM, GF2 PRO (64 meg).
I read Anands recent CPU scaling on the new UT engine article with great interest. I'm thinking of replacing my old GF2 PRO with a 4200.
My setup is fairly different (slower at a given CPU frequency) from the test machine (200 Mhz FSB, not 266, SDR not DDR). According to Anand's graphs, even allowing for older/slower MB, I would still get a noticeable improvement. I have to avoid Arena games in Tribes 2, because having loads of players on screen turns the game into a slideshow, and me into a victim. Has anybody tried this, or at least has a reasonably informed opinion? I wouldn't want to cough up $300 Canadian, and wind up having to return the card to the somewhat excitable Cantonese gentleman who runs my favorite computer store around here.
Thanks,
Bob Milne
My box is a KT7 - RAID, Athlon 1 Ghz, 384 megs RAM, GF2 PRO (64 meg).
I read Anands recent CPU scaling on the new UT engine article with great interest. I'm thinking of replacing my old GF2 PRO with a 4200.
My setup is fairly different (slower at a given CPU frequency) from the test machine (200 Mhz FSB, not 266, SDR not DDR). According to Anand's graphs, even allowing for older/slower MB, I would still get a noticeable improvement. I have to avoid Arena games in Tribes 2, because having loads of players on screen turns the game into a slideshow, and me into a victim. Has anybody tried this, or at least has a reasonably informed opinion? I wouldn't want to cough up $300 Canadian, and wind up having to return the card to the somewhat excitable Cantonese gentleman who runs my favorite computer store around here.
Thanks,
Bob Milne