- Oct 14, 2008
- 216
- 0
- 0
Take the following words:
"And clearly, power users who simply want the best low-maintenance solution will take the closed-loop liquid route."
(I was reminded that, usually, all liquid cooling solutions are "closed loop", so let's just ignore that and stick to what the reviewer was probably trying to say)
It kind of seems to me that the reviewer implies that CPU-only liquid liquid has some disadvantages. What are they? Other than not being able to add a GPU/PSU cooling solution later on (which I don't want to).
I think closed liquid loop is fantastic because it never develops bacteria or algae in there and can never leak.
"And clearly, power users who simply want the best low-maintenance solution will take the closed-loop liquid route."
(I was reminded that, usually, all liquid cooling solutions are "closed loop", so let's just ignore that and stick to what the reviewer was probably trying to say)
It kind of seems to me that the reviewer implies that CPU-only liquid liquid has some disadvantages. What are they? Other than not being able to add a GPU/PSU cooling solution later on (which I don't want to).
I think closed liquid loop is fantastic because it never develops bacteria or algae in there and can never leak.
Last edited:
