• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

CPU multipliers...

overst33r

Diamond Member
are they software of hardware based? if i use a program that changes the cpu multiplier based on power need...will toggling it much affect my processors longetvity?

im pretty sure they are software based...just wanted to ask...
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
are they software of hardware based? if i use a program that changes the cpu multiplier based on power need...will toggling it much affect my processors longetvity?

im pretty sure they are software based...just wanted to ask...

Hardware, some older CPUs were locked and no software or bios could unlock them without some mods to the actual hardware. This usually involved a pencil mod.
 
Software,

There is not 10x of something vs 9x physically built into a processor

In other words if you were to disect a 9x vs a 10x processor they would have and equal amount of parts
 
Originally posted by: tallman45
Software,

There is not 10x of something vs 9x physically built into a processor

In other words if you were to disect a 9x vs a 10x processor they would have and equal amount of parts

It's still done by hardware. They are fused a particular way to lock in the max multiplier(on chips with speedstep, or cool and quiet you can use lower multies, but not higher). It's not the number of parts, it's the way it's fused.

EDIT: Argh, not good at spelling early in the morning.
 
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Originally posted by: tallman45
Software,

There is not 10x of something vs 9x physically built into a processor

In other words if you were to disect a 9x vs a 10x processor they would have and equal amount of parts

It's still done by hardware. They are fused a particular way to lock in the max multiplier(on chips with speedstep, or cool and quiet you can use lower multies, but not higher). It's not the number of parts, it's the way it's fused.

EDIT: Argh, not good at spelling early in the morning.

so does it affect my CPU longevity if i use a program that constantly changes the multipliers? it is a 1.83 core due processor with the yonah chipset.
 
I've heard it's something like a 'firmware' that requires both special machinery and software.
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
so does it affect my CPU longevity if i use a program that constantly changes the multipliers? it is a 1.83 core due processor with the yonah chipset.
Not at all. Your motherboard will do it alot more often than you will, if you leave it at stock settings.
 
Originally posted by: lopri
I've heard it's something like a 'firmware' that requires both special machinery and software.

I remember hearing something similar about a resistor change and factory microcode change...
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Originally posted by: tallman45
Software,

There is not 10x of something vs 9x physically built into a processor

In other words if you were to disect a 9x vs a 10x processor they would have and equal amount of parts

It's still done by hardware. They are fused a particular way to lock in the max multiplier(on chips with speedstep, or cool and quiet you can use lower multies, but not higher). It's not the number of parts, it's the way it's fused.

EDIT: Argh, not good at spelling early in the morning.

so does it affect my CPU longevity if i use a program that constantly changes the multipliers? it is a 1.83 core due processor with the yonah chipset.


Won't hurt it at all. Actualy it's normaly for that cpu to change it's multipliers anyway. Thats what speedstep does, it drops the multiplier so that the cpu uses less power when it's not needed.
 
Back
Top