- Aug 11, 2008
- 10,451
- 642
- 126
So, I just got an new computer with an i5 2320 at 3.0ghz. I cant do any kind of overclocking because it is a Dell XPS and has an H77 motherboard. I am using a HD7770 and was pretty sure there was no way the CPU could bottleneck that card. So I was playing around with the built in benchmark and found going from med to low didnt increase the framerate. I am running at 1080p with or without advanced physX, antialiasing set to AAA.
Here are the benchmarks at 1080p, high, med, low quality:
With advanced physX: 29.7, 36.0, 37.0.
Without advanced physX: 39.7, 53.7, 54.7.
Unsurprisingly, running physX on the cpu pulls performance down, but I am very surprised at the results with physX turned off. Every other game I have tested at any setting pegs the GPU while using less than half cpu. Strangely at low and med settings without physX, where it looks like I am cpu limited, the cpu usage never reaches 100 percent on any core, but pretty much 80% on all four cores. Not sure why I am posting this, except that I thought the results were interesting, and am concerned that the cpu is more limiting than I expected, at least in this particular game.
Here are the benchmarks at 1080p, high, med, low quality:
With advanced physX: 29.7, 36.0, 37.0.
Without advanced physX: 39.7, 53.7, 54.7.
Unsurprisingly, running physX on the cpu pulls performance down, but I am very surprised at the results with physX turned off. Every other game I have tested at any setting pegs the GPU while using less than half cpu. Strangely at low and med settings without physX, where it looks like I am cpu limited, the cpu usage never reaches 100 percent on any core, but pretty much 80% on all four cores. Not sure why I am posting this, except that I thought the results were interesting, and am concerned that the cpu is more limiting than I expected, at least in this particular game.
