- Oct 22, 2007
- 238
- 0
- 0
I have an e6850 Core 2 Duo that I run at 3.6GHz most of the time, 3.4GHz more recently since I've been using different RAM, and I've had the opportunity to try a PNY GTX 460 OC and an Asus HD 6870 OC with the voltage tweak or whatever. I honestly didn't see a big difference between the performance of each of the cards in most of the games I tried (the Stalker series, Fallout 3 and New Vegas, newer Call of Duty games, etc).
The PNY GTX 460 is cheaper than the Asus HD 6870 (by at least $40), and I've recently been seeing a specific Zotac GTX 465 going for around $140 at some places online, after rebates. That's $30 cheaper than I could get the PNY GTX 460, and almost $100 cheaper than the Asus HD 6870.
I'm pretty sure I'm limited either by my dual core processor or the 4GB of RAM I got, and I'd notice more of a difference from the HD 6870 than I had if I had a quad core processor or 8GB of RAM. Either way, my point or question or whatever this is getting to is this: I doubt I'm going to be getting a new CPU or more RAM, so I'm trying to figure out which card is the best bang for my buck and also isn't going to be overkill for my current system. The Zotac 465 looks really tempting at $139 as long as the rebates all come in, even though they supposedly don't give quite as much performance as a standard GTX 460. Then I hear possibilities of getting GTX 465 cards with GTX 470 PCBs or something and are basically locked GTX 470s. With a dual core processor and 4GB of RAM, am I going to notice a big difference between a GTX 460 and a GTX 465, considering I couldn't even tell much of a difference between a GTX 460 and an HD 6870?
The PNY GTX 460 is cheaper than the Asus HD 6870 (by at least $40), and I've recently been seeing a specific Zotac GTX 465 going for around $140 at some places online, after rebates. That's $30 cheaper than I could get the PNY GTX 460, and almost $100 cheaper than the Asus HD 6870.
I'm pretty sure I'm limited either by my dual core processor or the 4GB of RAM I got, and I'd notice more of a difference from the HD 6870 than I had if I had a quad core processor or 8GB of RAM. Either way, my point or question or whatever this is getting to is this: I doubt I'm going to be getting a new CPU or more RAM, so I'm trying to figure out which card is the best bang for my buck and also isn't going to be overkill for my current system. The Zotac 465 looks really tempting at $139 as long as the rebates all come in, even though they supposedly don't give quite as much performance as a standard GTX 460. Then I hear possibilities of getting GTX 465 cards with GTX 470 PCBs or something and are basically locked GTX 470s. With a dual core processor and 4GB of RAM, am I going to notice a big difference between a GTX 460 and a GTX 465, considering I couldn't even tell much of a difference between a GTX 460 and an HD 6870?