- Jun 2, 2000
- 15,944
- 475
- 126
I finally made the jump over the weekend from a budget XP mobile to a budget Sempron 3100+. 
Sempron 3100+ w/ TT Venus 7 HSF
Epox 8KDA NF3
2x512MB GEIL PC3200 Value RAM
I picked up the newest E6 revision of the 3100+ Sempron (90nm, 256k L2, 1.40v stock voltage) and an Epox 8KDA3I NF3 board off the FS/FT trade forums.
I spend the better part of today following Zebo's A64 OC'ing guide trying to find out the maximum HT/FSB/CPU/memory values for the MB and chip, and here's what I've determined the maximum values to be:
HTT/FSB = 320 @ 3x
CPU = 2.55 to 2.65Ghz (see below)
RAM - 215 @ 2.5-4-3-7-1T
I was suprised and thrilled to see the board be able to hit 320Mhz. However, for some reason, the Vcore seems to be overvolted by about 0.1v. When running at the default voltage, the BIOS reports the Vcore to be 1.48v. Bumping the voltage up in the BIOS to +0.05v gives a reading of about 1.57v, and bumping it up further to +0.10v gives a reading around 1.67v.
Given a ~10% maximum voltage increase for overclocking, I'm a little worried to go above 1.57v. However, the load temps never go above 50C even when the Vcore is reported as 1.67v.
Using the max HT/FSB of 320, the best OC I've gotten so far is 2.56Ghz (8x320) at 1.57v. I lowed the multiplier down to 8x, but the RAM is running at 213Mhz, which is just below the max value of 215 Mhz.
Would it be worth it to run the Vcore at the 1.67v reported voltage for a higher clock speed (say an additional 100Mhz) at the expense of a significantly lower FSB and RAM bandwidth?
Sempron 3100+ w/ TT Venus 7 HSF
Epox 8KDA NF3
2x512MB GEIL PC3200 Value RAM
I picked up the newest E6 revision of the 3100+ Sempron (90nm, 256k L2, 1.40v stock voltage) and an Epox 8KDA3I NF3 board off the FS/FT trade forums.
I spend the better part of today following Zebo's A64 OC'ing guide trying to find out the maximum HT/FSB/CPU/memory values for the MB and chip, and here's what I've determined the maximum values to be:
HTT/FSB = 320 @ 3x
CPU = 2.55 to 2.65Ghz (see below)
RAM - 215 @ 2.5-4-3-7-1T
I was suprised and thrilled to see the board be able to hit 320Mhz. However, for some reason, the Vcore seems to be overvolted by about 0.1v. When running at the default voltage, the BIOS reports the Vcore to be 1.48v. Bumping the voltage up in the BIOS to +0.05v gives a reading of about 1.57v, and bumping it up further to +0.10v gives a reading around 1.67v.
Given a ~10% maximum voltage increase for overclocking, I'm a little worried to go above 1.57v. However, the load temps never go above 50C even when the Vcore is reported as 1.67v.
Using the max HT/FSB of 320, the best OC I've gotten so far is 2.56Ghz (8x320) at 1.57v. I lowed the multiplier down to 8x, but the RAM is running at 213Mhz, which is just below the max value of 215 Mhz.
Would it be worth it to run the Vcore at the 1.67v reported voltage for a higher clock speed (say an additional 100Mhz) at the expense of a significantly lower FSB and RAM bandwidth?