- Nov 20, 2009
- 8,409
- 1,617
- 136
Well, if employers can charge a premium to employees for smoking then so, too, should they for being anti-vax. Personally, I say let every adult anti-vaxxer die. Zero sympathy.
Disenfranchise them from what?That is going to disenfranchise the poor even more.
Difference is that ACA specifically permitting for smokers.Well, if employers can charge a premium to employees for smoking then so, too, should they for being anti-vax. Personally, I say let every adult anti-vaxxer die. Zero sympathy.
Tax breaks for the vaccinated?????? Tax breaks for corporations that require it.??????Just add a tax to cigarettes that covers the cost of treatment. 😏
State can mandate everyone get vaccinated. That been state right since 1905 but politically this is suicideJust a question I thought of..... How is getting a vaccination any different than paying taxes. People who want the benefits and protections of a society and taxes are the way that is accomplished. This necessary evil is right up there with the fact of death, as the other certain thing. Why then is it not the right of the state, the will of the majority of the people who vote for the government as best meets their expectations of safety happiness etc. to mandate vaccines? Seems like in a party infected democracy nothing can be done least it advantage the other side, unless you are the kind of conservative of course whose aim is to eliminate democracy generally. In a war between fear of losing one's elected office as a law making politician and fear of the people of being infected by the unvaccinated, I wonder who will win.
Mandate state population gets vaccinated to stop spread of deadly disease? Save lives?State can mandate everyone get vaccinated. That been state right since 1905 but politically this is suicide
Where can the hesitation be in committing suicide so the many can live especially when only a position of power is at stake and not one's actual life? It's called public service, not self service, no?State can mandate everyone get vaccinated. That been state right since 1905 but politically this is suicide
Most politicians became politicians for fame and power, most of them don't care about anyone.Where can the hesitation be in committing suicide so the many can live especially when only a position of power is at stake and not one's actual life? It's called public service, not self service, no?
State can mandate everyone get vaccinated. That been state right since 1905 but politically this is suicide
You are more concerned about that then people who did the responsible thing and got vaccinated but can now die due to no fault of theirs because they can't get into a hospital for treatment due to people that are choking our healthcare resources due to a very simple choice of a 5 second jab? That's a lot easier to do than pretty much anything else that can prevent serious illness taking you to the ER.So you are making a decision based on your moral judgement of the person in need? Not triage, then. Kind of like distinguishing between the deserving and undeserving poor? Again, I just am uneasy about where that leads.
I am not sure about that. I can see even many blue states having big issue with it. There is a line that one crosses on personal freedom and even Democrats got a problem with it.It would only be politically suicide in states full of idiots.. so basically the red states..
We already mandate them with kids. You can't take your kids to school without being vaccinated and pretty much everyone takes their kids to school and gets their kids vaccinated. It has nothing to do with whether its a mandate or not. What we're seeing today is a combination of politics, misinformation, and idiocy in equal proportions.I am not sure about that. I can see even many blue states having big issue with it. There is a line that one crosses on personal freedom and even Democrats got a problem with it.
You shouldn't be allowed medical for something you are in denial for.
Why do do everyone keep posting that when it's not really true. Sure some state did away with ability not to vaccinate their kids but most haven't.We already mandate them with kids. You can't take your kids to school without being vaccinated and pretty much everyone takes their kids to school and gets their kids vaccinated. It has nothing to do with whether its a mandate or not. What we're seeing today is a combination of politics, misinformation, and idiocy in equal proportions.
Most Democrats don't have an issue with mandated vaccines.. But there again, most democrats are not acting like children, are being responsible adults, and have received the vaccine without acting out, unlike many republican's. Also, vaccines have zero to do with person freedom.. sorry.. you are an idiot if you think your freedom has been compromised by a vaccine mandate.I am not sure about that. I can see even many blue states having big issue with it. There is a line that one crosses on personal freedom and even Democrats got a problem with it.
Freedom haven't been compromised when it's mandate to work for government, to work for government contractor, health care etc anyone that do not want to work for those entity is welcome to find another job. I have some issue with city's issuing vaccine requirement to enter restaurant, gym's etc but as long as it's not state wide it's pretty easy to bypass it.Most Democrats don't have an issue with mandated vaccines.. But there again, most democrats are not acting like children, are being responsible adults, and have received the vaccine without acting out, unlike many republican's. Also, vaccines have zero to do with person freedom.. sorry.. you are an idiot if you think your freedom has been compromised by a vaccine mandate.
Just because you have an issue, does not equate to you losing your freedom. you haven't. you are free to chose to comply with the requirement, or not. Just as you are free to abide by the speed limit, or not and risk getting a ticket or jail time.. You still have not lost your freedom. You just lost the ability to be selfish towards other's health and well being..Freedom haven't been compromised when it's mandate to work for government, to work for government contractor, health care etc anyone that do not want to work for those entity is welcome to find another job. I have some issue with city's issuing vaccine requirement to enter restaurant, gym's etc but as long as it's not state wide it's pretty easy to bypass it.
My only issue with your example is one must agree to follow all traffic laws when getting driver license, one never had to agree that they can't be selfish toward others.Just because you have an issue, does not equate to you losing your freedom. you haven't. you are free to chose to comply with the requirement, or not. Just as you are free to abide by the speed limit, or not and risk getting a ticket or jail time.. You still have not lost your freedom. You just lost the ability to be selfish towards other's health and well being..
Not wearing a seatbelt, going into a rough part of town, not dressing conservatively, and any other similar acts do not put anyone else but the individual at risk, unlike not being vaccine. Now, should they be denied health care, no.. But they should be charged with assault, attempted murder, and any other criminal charges that go with putting the general population in harms way on purpose.It's kind of like suggesting that if you weren't wearing a seatbelt, you shouldn't get emergency care if in an automobile accident, or if you didn't have due diligence to stay out of the rough part of town, shouldn't be treated for a gunshot wound, or if you didn't dress conservatively, it's okay if someone rapes you.
Sorry no, hating on people to that extent is worse than whatever excuse you were using to hate on them.
Not wearing a seatbelt, going into a rough part of town, not dressing conservatively, and any other similar acts do not put anyone else but the individual at risk, unlike not being vaccine.
Uhhh, No! When you get a driver's license, you are agreeing that you KNOW The laws of the road, and you know and must demonstrate, how to drive a car safety. You must abide by those laws to KEEP that license. OR do you think that if you drive without a license the laws of the road don't apply to you since you didn't "agree" by getting a license. The laws of the road apply with or without a license.My only issue with your example is one must agree to follow all traffic laws when getting driver license, one never had to agree that they can't be selfish toward others.
In understandable english please.Why do do everyone keep posting that when it's not really true. Sure some state did away with ability not to vaccinate their kids but most haven't.
State with Religious and Philosphical exemption
If parents didn't want their kids to get vaccinated, in most states they are able to keep them from having to get vaccinated and still keep their monster attending school.In understandable english please.
