I don't see it. Moonie is a two trick pony, he has his "self hate" track, and his "conservatives are inferior" track. Once in a while he combines the two.
I often find him entertaining, but almost never find anything he says in any way enlightening.
I've often found recovering addicts to have much the same thought process, they tend to latch on to an idea to the exclusion of all else. It doesn't make them bad people, but it does make them hard to reason with.
For whatever reason, Moonie desperately needs to prove there is something wrong with conservatives, nothing is going to sway him, nothing will change his mind, and his opinion is apparently valued enough that he's allowed to continue his antics. Perhaps it's that he adds to the hostile environment of P&N that we seem to so enjoy.
The introduction of mediation which alter the functioning of the mind process from how it was created are the 'tricks' used to bring about conformity to within some notion of well being, I'd think.
Assuming a population within a normal curve and excluding those who are more than say... a standard deviation from the norm are the folks who'd I'd like to think would be rather consistent on most all 'things'. I'd wager, their environment and the evolution within that environment is the only variable that ought to be in play given we evolved from a single source locale. I'd not expect an Iranian to glop on to the notion of democracy and I'd expect them to be satisfied with their lot in life. Likewise, I'd expect an American to be like any other American on most all topics.
Somewhere along the line we've developed a split in reasoning. And rather quickly it seems.
What puzzles me is the How of it all. How can a Mormon accept the Joseph Smith scenario and How can a Baptist, Jew, Muslim or Catholic even try to elect a person to the Presidency whoever may have those beliefs? (No offense meant)
Some would say that to believe in what Smith or that Scientology fellow propounds must be barking mad... (my grandmother's favorite saying).
I suppose when we've figured out what consciousness is and how it began we may figure out how we can see the same thing differently.
Regarding Moonbeam...
I suspect he has a similar dilemma.... How is it that we are so alike but so different while being sort of all hatched in the same nest.
What makes us react differently to similar stimuli? Some say fear... is the motivator for some stuff... but what creates the fear to greater extents among us... It must be our brain functioning mind... I think it is as basic as that. The brain mandates how the mind functions and how the brain is created dictates that... and that is genetics... Where did we split apart? We've only a 150,000 years of development to do it and it seems most of that time we were quite similar in our thinking and perhaps it is because it was not so complex... we had to eat and not be eaten... We may have evolved some aspects beyond our ability to deal with the complexity of today....
We are aliens among aliens and all from the same planet.