Heh. It's somewhat amusing watching a consistent appeal to authority where the authority in question is also the person making the claim. 😛
Still waiting for a source from agent...
Golly gee mister, I ain't never seen them fancy headlights before! You'll have to explain it to me again.
Still, no evidence to suggest an efficiency level of any sort.
Why would it take a "source" to see what's readily evident from looking at any headlight design? Have you figured out yet how 40% of the light could be trapped in said any? Seem rather obvious that anyone who can at least point to the obvious is not the equal of those who have a real hard time with it all, and the subsequent conversation would be one of spoon feeding rather than where rules of debate might apply.
It's curious why you don't quote my posts in your replies. It's worth elaborating that I don't use technical words at times out of coincidence but so that googling them will produced sufficient explanation to avoid said spoon feeding, for readers of marginal ability at least. In the case notice the previous references to the applicable optic types, which should produce some efficiency ranges, the only one of which is close to 40% are TIR optics used in led systems. Also worth pointing out that someone previous in the thread even gave you reflector loss numbers, so it makes sense why basic research was well out of ability here.
Once again, an appeal to (self)authority with a side of ad hominem.
The reflector losses that rstrohkirch mentioned were for LEDs, not HIDs. The two technologies have different reflector losses. Not sure what you're trying to get at.
I am confused about why it's so hard for you to link these sources that you can find so easily.
Doesn't really help your case to consider basic calculations to be an appeal to authority. Also "ad hom" doesn't mean mocking someone, but an invalid personal justification for dismissing an argument which doesn't apply here at all. Seems pretty obvious you don't know anything about these sort of terms so best avoid using them to prevent looking dumb.
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.
The counterargument trivially explained both why you claim was wrong and what led to the incompetence. It makes perfect sense though that you'll continue having such a hard time understanding any of it.
I am still waiting for a response that is not fallacious and JCH13 is still waiting for a source to back up your claims. Repeating your own claims does not make you correct.
So I'm thinking now of replacing my headlights for my Ford C-max. Aside from the efficiency thing, I can barely see them while on the road much of the time.
Recommend some HID lights? What color temperature is best?
Reflector losses depend on the type of light source because HIDs emit light in all directions that needs to be directed 'forward.' LEDs emit light in one direction already, requiring less optical intervention to get pointed in the desired area than HID, which means they have lower reflector losses than HID.
Those pretty pictures you've been linking to make the big assumption that the light source is a point, which is certainly not true.