The houses would have been there, but they would have lost even more of their value.
They are still going to lose even more of their value.
Look at Detroit. There are houses all over the place, but they are worthless because no one wants to buy them or no one can come up with the money to buy them. Now imagine if our entire country became Detroit.
That sounds like a combination of supply/demand and overpriced housing (if no one can come up with the funds to buy them as you argue). Since the .gov has been backing virtually ALL new home loans in the last few years, why exactly would no one be able to get a loan if not for the big banks? I assume that my local bank can sell loans to Frannie just as easily as they can and if they can't that would be an easy fix.
We can get into the actual problems that might have been created if you wish but the above is a very bad example.
BTW the solution to the problem is to prevent it from happening again, but our government seems to avoid such a solution and instead just creates tons of agencies in charge of making sure it doesn't happen again.
That has been my entire point. Not only did we avoid a solution but thanks in part to TARP and a shitload of other .gov assistance the too big to fail assholes got even bigger by purchasing their competition for pennies on the dollar. Will that still be a success the next time they put a gun to our heads? Seeing how well it worked for them this time (seriously, could it have possibly worked any better for them?) there will be a next time and now instead of a rifle they have a bazooka. Good job.
OR as I have stated, you give them 2 choices when they are in dire need. Choice 1: We give you the money and you MUST do X,Y,Z that will prevent this from happening again and no you do not get to not to profit off of all that bullshit paper at the taxpayers expense. You will survive but you will take a large haircut and sorry but you can forget about your fat ass bonuses. Choice 2: We nationalize your ass and sell your companies off piece by piece. Since we ended up purchasing most of their worthless paper at FACE FUCKING VALUE anyway, I don't see how this would have been worse.
Oh yeah, we are ordering a full investigation of your organizations and any and all fraudulent and illegal activity will be prosecuted with extreme prejudice.
Instead we did the exact opposite, we still ended up with most of their trash paper while they got even bigger and started making record profits within a year or two of them being on the brink of bringing the entire financial system down. We legalized accounting fraud which allows them to hide the fact that they might be getting into trouble again among other things. Not only have we not imposed any sort of meaningful new reforms on them (Glass-Steagall anyone?) but we continue to allow them to commit blatant fraud and even more blatantly illegal activities such as front running and market manipulation.
Hell, we now have proof that banks have foreclosed on peoples homes that the bank had NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN. Someone who did not own the house nor had any financial interest in was allowed to kick people out of their homes and foreclose on them. Betcha no one goes to jail for this bullshit either but of course you HAVE to agree that they should be allowed to continue. If they aren't then the banks go boom-boom because they, in a lot of cases, intentionally shredded the wet ink documents required by black letter law in most states to foreclose on someones house. If they can't foreclose on all of those houses the paper the banks are holding are literally worth zero. If that happens then we are back to financial Armageddon right? So I can't see how you could have any other opinion than "let the banks break black letter law and take assets they can not prove they have an interest in". That is the only other option if the documents required by law no longer exist and since they are even bigger now, thank you very much, the risk is even greater, right?
Yup, bang up job there buddy.
