So the wife and I have been kind of milling around the idea of having kids some day, and I was looking to see some estimates on cost to see what I could expect as far as a monthly cost of having a kid would do to our budget.
So I did some googling, and the first 3 results came back were:
http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/family/kids/tlkidscost.asp
http://www.babycenter.com/cost-of-raising-child-calculator
http://www.pregnancy-info.net/raising_child_cost.html
All of them have a substantial $$ associated with housing and transportation. For housing they have mortgage payments, furniture, insurance. For transportation they have the cost of a vehicle, gas, etc...
I don't get it. Why the hell would having a kid result in having to pay more $$ for a house and car? I already have a house suitable for raising kids. I already have 2 cars. I can see paying extra for fuel for a car to drive the kid around more places.
I don't understand why they would include this stuff in the cost estimate. These are things that 99% of the population already has.
It's not like the bum on the street corner is googling about what he needs to raise a child.
Is this really where the 300K figure to raise a child from 0-18 comes from? Like half of it is "housing and transporation", stuff you would be paying for regardless of whether you had a kid or not.
All the other categories make sense. Food.. yeah, you're gonna be spending extra on food, clothes, healthcare, childcare, and misc other shit.
So I guess my question is: To the parents of ATOT, do you have any kinds of figures from when you raised your kid as to how much extra monthly you needed?
From what i'm seeing, if you get rid of housing and transportation, you'd be looking at maybe $1000 a month.
So I did some googling, and the first 3 results came back were:
http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/family/kids/tlkidscost.asp
http://www.babycenter.com/cost-of-raising-child-calculator
http://www.pregnancy-info.net/raising_child_cost.html
All of them have a substantial $$ associated with housing and transportation. For housing they have mortgage payments, furniture, insurance. For transportation they have the cost of a vehicle, gas, etc...
I don't get it. Why the hell would having a kid result in having to pay more $$ for a house and car? I already have a house suitable for raising kids. I already have 2 cars. I can see paying extra for fuel for a car to drive the kid around more places.
I don't understand why they would include this stuff in the cost estimate. These are things that 99% of the population already has.
It's not like the bum on the street corner is googling about what he needs to raise a child.
Is this really where the 300K figure to raise a child from 0-18 comes from? Like half of it is "housing and transporation", stuff you would be paying for regardless of whether you had a kid or not.
All the other categories make sense. Food.. yeah, you're gonna be spending extra on food, clothes, healthcare, childcare, and misc other shit.
So I guess my question is: To the parents of ATOT, do you have any kinds of figures from when you raised your kid as to how much extra monthly you needed?
From what i'm seeing, if you get rid of housing and transportation, you'd be looking at maybe $1000 a month.
Last edited:
