Originally posted by: Tomash
Originally posted by: buzzsaw13
Originally posted by: TrevorRC
Originally posted by: Tomash
I'm talking a comparison between two 1GB sticks of each, DDR500.
On a DFI LanParty NF4 Ultra-D, with an X2 3800+ in the socket.
I intend to overclock the processor as far as stability allows, so which RAM would be better?
If the $60 increase in price of the OCZ sticks worth it?
G.SKill HZs (Black) or their cheaper ones (Aquaish).... they also have some nice looking red ones.
Take your pick.
The HZs run @ DDR500; ~200 shipped on the egg.
He's already got 2gbs of XMS rated at DDR500, it would be a waste of money to spend that much on HZ's
Most likely his XMS will be able to handle 260fsb if he loosens the timings. Even if the ram can't he can always put up a divider and take a small hit in bandwith.
What's all this divider talk/ I've been out of the loop for like 2 years, so I'm not up to date on the jargon.
A divider runs the ram at a ratio of the FSB, so you can have high FSB and run your ram.
If you look in your memory timing settings, there should be an option that lists a couple speeds, 400mhz 333mhz 266mhz and 200mhz (some mobos it might be 200, 166, 133, 100) DFI boards have more options, but typically most mobos are going to have those. If you're trying to run 280x9 on your CPU but your ram can't handle 280FSB, you put up a divider to run your ram slower. For example if you run the 333mhz or 166 divider, to calculate your ram speed, its 333/400 multiplied by your FSB giving you 232mhz for your ram speed. For the 266 divider it would be 266/400 multiplied by your FSB giving you 186mhz for your ram speed.
If you have valueram, you almost always have to run a divider since valueram can't hit high speeds.